2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Placement of a distal implant to convert a mandibular removable Kennedy class I to an implant-supported partial removable Class III dental prosthesis: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, implant treatment with GBR imposes greater physical, mental, and financial burdens on patients because it is a surgically invasive procedure [15,16]. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the survival rate of narrow-diameter implants in the mandibular molar region.…”
Section: Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, implant treatment with GBR imposes greater physical, mental, and financial burdens on patients because it is a surgically invasive procedure [15,16]. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the survival rate of narrow-diameter implants in the mandibular molar region.…”
Section: Key Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También que "…los implantes no son inmunes a las enfermedades, por lo tanto el reemplazo de dientes con implantes requiere una evaluación crítica de los factores etiológicos, factores contribuyentes y pronósticos junto con una evaluación en profundidad de los beneficios del riesgo y los factores de costo-beneficio…". Ahora bien, es justo reconocer la utilidad de esta terapia biotecnológica como alternativa terapéutica si se usa con justificaciones sólidas y eficientemente en pacientes sin compromiso sistémico, por ejemplo: conservar dientes vecinos sin preparaciones para coronas, o en esquemas de apoyo a zonas mucosoportadas libres en prótesis parcial removible, como retención en el uso de obturadores maxilofaciales o prótesis maxilofaciales (desde luego con sus limitantes), también como anclajes ortodónticos, y finalmente para mayor retención y estabilidad en sobredentaduras muco-implanto-soportadas y mucodento-implanto-soportadas que por cierto, bajo la óp-tica de la evidencia, son las terapias con implantes más previsibles (Brånemark et al;Hug et al, 2006;Zancopé et al, 2015;Matsudate et al, 2016). Las formas de hacerlo son múltiples y con criterio y voluntad se puede dar destino a un producto biotecnológico trascendental pero sin agredir lo natural.…”
Section: "Para Engañar a Los Demás Hay Que Mostrarse Convincenteyunclassified
“…[245789] The retention and stability of the dentures are being improved with placing the implants bilaterally. [124] Moreover, implant support decreases the resorption of the alveolar ridges and the need of relining procedures in the following years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[245789] The retention and stability of the dentures are being improved with placing the implants bilaterally. [124] Moreover, implant support decreases the resorption of the alveolar ridges and the need of relining procedures in the following years. [101112] As a result, this treatment modality could resolve intrusion movement problem of the RPD while reducing treatment costs compare with implant-supported fixed prosthesis and resulting in greater patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%