2005
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place-related neural responses in the monkey hippocampal formation in a virtual space

Abstract: Place cells in the rodent hippocampal formation (HF) are suggested to be the neural substrate for a spatial cognitive map. This specific spatial property of the place cells are regulated by both allothetic cues (i.e., intramaze local and distal cues) as well as idiothetic sensory inputs; the context signaled by the distal cues allows local and idiothetic cues to be employed for spatial tuning within the maze. To investigate the effects of distal cues on place-related activity of primate HF neurons, 228 neurons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Place cells encode the patient's presence at a specific location, spiking only when the patient is at a particular position and facing a certain direction. The critical difference between path and place cells is that path cells continuously encode direction across the environment, whereas place cells activate only at specific locations and otherwise are silent (4,6,22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Place cells encode the patient's presence at a specific location, spiking only when the patient is at a particular position and facing a certain direction. The critical difference between path and place cells is that path cells continuously encode direction across the environment, whereas place cells activate only at specific locations and otherwise are silent (4,6,22).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neurons in CA1 and CA3 remap their place fields upon changes made in the environment, as demonstrated in rodents (13)(14)(15)(16)(17), Chiroptera (35), and primates (36). Because the adaptive remapping of hippocampal place fields is a relatively fast and EC-dependent process (13,37), it is plausible to assume that neurons in the EC are endowed with some degree of flexibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, considering the complexity and scalability of human environments, humans might rely on extracting information from optic flow more efficiently than rats do, given that there is theoretically sufficient information available from optic flow for grid formation (45). The predominance of visual input in the human brain allows detection and mapping of spatial cues more quickly and may influence grid parameters to a greater degree than is possible in the rat brain (35)(36)(37). It might also allow the human hippocampus and EC to perform more naturally in virtual navigation tasks, where proprioceptive and kinesthetic cues are absent (30,31,46,47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, to develop a cognitive map, rats have to locomote across the parts of the environment that they will come to represent [34][35][36]. In contrast, human and nonhuman primates can represent an environment by viewing it, without having to locomote over each portion to be represented [37][38][39][40][41]. Thus, unlike primates, rats' sensory world is often tied to the region just beyond their noses, whiskers and paws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%