2014
DOI: 10.1167/14.10.364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place recognition and heading retrieval are dissociable in mice (and possibly men)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings suggest selective impairment to representation of geometric layout in people with WS, but not to representation of features, a pattern which is consistent with theories and evidence suggesting that the two navigational systems are separable in terms of both behavioral mechanism (Julian, Keinath, Muzzio, & Epstein, 2014; Lee & Spelke, 2010; Lee, Shusterman, & Spelke, 2006) and underlying neural instantiation (Doeller & Burgess, 2008; Doeller et al, 2008). The WS pattern differs qualitatively from that of TD individuals, for whom geometry is used from a very early point in development, and features are integrated with geometry in both small and large spaces from about age 5 onward (Hermer-Vasquez, Moffet, & Munkholm, 2001; Learmonth et al, 2002).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…These findings suggest selective impairment to representation of geometric layout in people with WS, but not to representation of features, a pattern which is consistent with theories and evidence suggesting that the two navigational systems are separable in terms of both behavioral mechanism (Julian, Keinath, Muzzio, & Epstein, 2014; Lee & Spelke, 2010; Lee, Shusterman, & Spelke, 2006) and underlying neural instantiation (Doeller & Burgess, 2008; Doeller et al, 2008). The WS pattern differs qualitatively from that of TD individuals, for whom geometry is used from a very early point in development, and features are integrated with geometry in both small and large spaces from about age 5 onward (Hermer-Vasquez, Moffet, & Munkholm, 2001; Learmonth et al, 2002).…”
supporting
confidence: 87%