2013
DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.111.034348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place of safety orders in England: changes in use and outcome, 1984/5 to 2010/11

Abstract: Aims and methodTo detail changes in the use of place of safety orders in England, including the outcome of these detentions, using publicly available data.ResultsThere was a sixfold increase in the rate of the Mental Health Act Section 136 detentions to places of safety in hospitals between 1984 and 2011. The use of Section 135 and the rate of subsequent detention under Section 2 or 3 also increased, but the proportion of people detained fell as the absolute rate of detention increased. There was a wide variat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduction is in contrast to the steady increase in the use of section 136 nationally. 16 The Norwich site with support based solely in the police control room, by contrast, showed no significant change in overall numbers of section 136 detentions. The data provide some possible explanations for this observed difference between the sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This reduction is in contrast to the steady increase in the use of section 136 nationally. 16 The Norwich site with support based solely in the police control room, by contrast, showed no significant change in overall numbers of section 136 detentions. The data provide some possible explanations for this observed difference between the sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since its inception, the frequency with which the Mental Health Act is used has followed an upward trend, 6,12 with a considerably greater rise in the use of s.136. 13 The Department of Health's recent Review of Operations of s.136 suggested that its growing use was in part explained by more people being taken to hospital-based places of safety and fewer taken to police cells where historically its recording has been patchy. 6 In addition, the rise was thought to be partly due to improved quality of data.…”
Section: Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across England and Wales in 2012/13, a total of 21,814 individuals were detained and assessed under S136 with 14,053 assessed in a hospital setting (64%) and 7,761 in a police cell (36%) with 82% not progressing after their clinical assessment to any further Section of the Mental Health Act [75]. The inappropriate S136 detentions were not only the result of a lack of awareness of available options and of the need to use the least restrictive option, but also of deliberate use of this option to ensure urgent access to mental health services or in situations where a person is voluntarily seeking help [68]. Research also acknowledged that detention in a police cell as place of safety can be highly distressing [76].These inappropriate S136 detentions caused unnecessary financial burden on NHS [31,65,68].…”
Section: Key Policy Reports Recommend Ever-closer Partnership Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inappropriate S136 detentions were not only the result of a lack of awareness of available options and of the need to use the least restrictive option, but also of deliberate use of this option to ensure urgent access to mental health services or in situations where a person is voluntarily seeking help [68]. Research also acknowledged that detention in a police cell as place of safety can be highly distressing [76].These inappropriate S136 detentions caused unnecessary financial burden on NHS [31,65,68].…”
Section: Key Policy Reports Recommend Ever-closer Partnership Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%