2020
DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2020.1713994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place-making and the everyday lives of children born into the Lord’s Resistance Army

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once ‘home’, many children experience stigma and social isolation (Akello, 2013; MacDonald and Kerali, 2020; Musaka, 2017), often in retaliation for the harm the LRA inflicted on the community during the war (Akello, 2019). Acholi society is based on a patrilineal system, where children are typically raised in paternal clans, with their identity and well-being found there, and so, not knowing their paternal clan compounds the children’s sense of non-belonging (Stewart, 2020). The conflict damaged the social fabric of Acholi society, tarnishing relationships within extended kinship networks expected to accommodate children from the same clan (Kiconco and Nthakomwa, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once ‘home’, many children experience stigma and social isolation (Akello, 2013; MacDonald and Kerali, 2020; Musaka, 2017), often in retaliation for the harm the LRA inflicted on the community during the war (Akello, 2019). Acholi society is based on a patrilineal system, where children are typically raised in paternal clans, with their identity and well-being found there, and so, not knowing their paternal clan compounds the children’s sense of non-belonging (Stewart, 2020). The conflict damaged the social fabric of Acholi society, tarnishing relationships within extended kinship networks expected to accommodate children from the same clan (Kiconco and Nthakomwa, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not contradictory to reintegration, belonging (or conversely exclusion) is a facet of reintegration that is expounded on in this paper and builds on the efforts of Angucia (2010), McIntyre (2005) and Honwana (2006) to elucidate a nexus between rehabilitation, reintegration and reconciliation. This is to say that while belonging and exclusion have important ramifications for the reintegration of CAYP into their families and communities, they can also be understood as significant to the broader processes of post-conflict rehabilitation and reconciliation (as argued by Stewart 2017).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument presented thus far is that changes in the family's structure and function can contribute to a broader sense of exclusion amongst young people. The internalisation of this lack of belonging creates challenges in the ability to negotiate a strong sense of place in families and wider communities (Stewart 2017). Social exclusion is also commonly cited as a driver of insecurity and vulnerability for youth more broadly (van Kessel & Abbink 2005; Agbiboa 2015; Martuscelli & Villa 2018).…”
Section: Unbelonging and Youth After Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(see for example Apio, 2016;Baines, 2017;Porter, 2017;Stewart, 2017;Atim et al, 2018, p. 68). Some of the mothers reported that upon return, their families had been killed or displacedthe result of which was life in poverty, and inability to fend for their children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%