2010
DOI: 10.1057/pb.2010.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place branding from a multi-level perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Liverpool City Council These results confirm the findings of Morgan et al (2004), Anholt (2006), Hankinson (2004a) Farrell (2008), van Gelder (2008, Syssner (2010), Van Assche and Lo, 2011 and others who note that place branding is the result of multiple stakeholder engagement. However, this research allows us to categorise the different stakeholder groups and establish their relative roles in the place branding process (as brand creators or brand drivers).…”
Section: Brand Creatorssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liverpool City Council These results confirm the findings of Morgan et al (2004), Anholt (2006), Hankinson (2004a) Farrell (2008), van Gelder (2008, Syssner (2010), Van Assche and Lo, 2011 and others who note that place branding is the result of multiple stakeholder engagement. However, this research allows us to categorise the different stakeholder groups and establish their relative roles in the place branding process (as brand creators or brand drivers).…”
Section: Brand Creatorssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This has been further echoed by Syssner (2010) who suggests that place branding is a conceptualised entity formed by interpretation and decisions made by various stakeholders with different levels of involvement and power. Therefore, it becomes essential to categorise these different groups and link their objectives to the role that they played in place branding as well as the impact on businesses development.…”
Section: Features Of Place Brandingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Document analysis and observation are not practised independently, but are often combined with other qualitative methods in an attempt to capture a more comprehensive picture of place brands (for example, Nobili, 2005;Syssner, 2010;McElroy, 2011). Furthermore, studies on marketing communications and stakeholder relationships may be related to the attitudes of the public sector or place marketers as revealed through in-depth and focus groups (for example, Hankinson, 2001;Stone, 2005;Hudson and Hawkins, 2006;Laaksonen et al, 2006;Wagner and Peters, 2009;Ooi and Pedersen, 2010).…”
Section: Aligning Research Methods With Topic Areas In Place Brandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A radically different account of the scalar arrangements of place branding as interactive, dynamic and negotiated is suggested by Syssner (2010). This study explicitly seeks to inscribe place branding in a multi-level perspective that recognises the fluid, multiple and overlapping existence of different spatial levels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%