Settlements at the Edge 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781784711962.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place-based planning in remote regions: Cape York Peninsula, Australia and Nunavut, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite an emphasis on evidence-informed policy and accountability [ 24 ], the basis for the selection of indicators by government to monitor improvements in Indigenous health and wellbeing and the local relevance of these indicators is not always clear [ 25 , 26 ]. A system-wide approach to identify indicators for transparent priority setting and engagement with Indigenous community stakeholders is also lacking [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite an emphasis on evidence-informed policy and accountability [ 24 ], the basis for the selection of indicators by government to monitor improvements in Indigenous health and wellbeing and the local relevance of these indicators is not always clear [ 25 , 26 ]. A system-wide approach to identify indicators for transparent priority setting and engagement with Indigenous community stakeholders is also lacking [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that there are many legal mechanisms that pursue nature conservation goals on certain lands, which are not included in the CAPAD database. For example, legal land use instruments are used to designate areas of environmental significance (Nelson, 2019) or conservation-oriented legal agreements between municipal councils and landowners (Harwood et al, 2016). These differ between states, are not aggregated in centralized databases even at the state level and lie outside the scope of the present analysis.…”
Section: Land Tenurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it turns out that the diversity of contexts (rural, peripheral, northern, remote, indigenous, temporary communities, etc.) calls for a variety of strategies that are community sensitive and adapted to each “place‐workforce‐workplace fit” (Carson, Wenghofer, et al, ), what is put forward in a “place‐based approach” (Harwood, Wensing, & Ensign, ; Vodden, Gibson, & Baldacchino, ). Hence, the roles of employment, team and work environment, social relationships, culture, climate, and other features of “place” in attracting migrants north (and keeping them there) are increasingly discussed (Carson, Rasmussen, Ensign, Huskey, & Taylor, ; Humphreys, Jones, & Jones, ; Simard, ; Taylor et al, ; Viscomi, Larkins, & Gupta, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Ways Of Dwelling Of New Residents Of mentioning
confidence: 99%