2020
DOI: 10.1177/1473325020918794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Place and space in social work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By proceeding within the framework of Conversation Analysis (see Sidnell and Stivers, 2012), with a focus on embodied interaction and its multimodal organization (see Mondada, 2019b;Streeck et al, 2011), the present study examines the sequential and multimodal organization of closings, revealing how this routine is locally accomplished not only through talk but, crucially, through participants' bodily conduct involving mobility (namely, their walking trajectories toward the exit, resulting in clients' passage and professionals' bystanding, that is, "seeing clients to the door") and tactility (namely, professionals' gentle patting of clients' backs, as well as pushing and holding knob and door). Besides further shedding light into the embodied dimension of social work intervention (see Monteiro, 2016Monteiro, , 2017Monteiro, , 2021, this study shows how place, mobility and touch are constitutive aspects of the interactional organization of closings in social work practice (see Bryant and Williams, 2020;Ferguson, 2008;Green, 2017;Stanley et al, 2016), inviting to their ethnomethodological and embodied "respecification" (see Garfinkel, 1991;Mondada, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…By proceeding within the framework of Conversation Analysis (see Sidnell and Stivers, 2012), with a focus on embodied interaction and its multimodal organization (see Mondada, 2019b;Streeck et al, 2011), the present study examines the sequential and multimodal organization of closings, revealing how this routine is locally accomplished not only through talk but, crucially, through participants' bodily conduct involving mobility (namely, their walking trajectories toward the exit, resulting in clients' passage and professionals' bystanding, that is, "seeing clients to the door") and tactility (namely, professionals' gentle patting of clients' backs, as well as pushing and holding knob and door). Besides further shedding light into the embodied dimension of social work intervention (see Monteiro, 2016Monteiro, , 2017Monteiro, , 2021, this study shows how place, mobility and touch are constitutive aspects of the interactional organization of closings in social work practice (see Bryant and Williams, 2020;Ferguson, 2008;Green, 2017;Stanley et al, 2016), inviting to their ethnomethodological and embodied "respecification" (see Garfinkel, 1991;Mondada, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In many countries centered to large cities, and people who live in poverty and in in communities with migrant background suffer from higher death rates. This makes it important for social work practice to scrutinize power relations related to space and place; to use scaling as a tool to recognize intersectional inequalities from the micro level of bodies, private and institutional homes, welfare systems and civil society (compare Bryant and Williams, 2020).…”
Section: Windows To a Pandemic: (G)local Environment Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 n.˚ 2, jul-Dic 2022, issn (impreso): 0123-4986, issn (en línea): 2256-5493, bogotá • 241-266 constelación espacial De conceptos para trabajo social: ambiente, lugar, territorio y paisaje [ 245 ] Esta transversalidad de la dimensión espacial es un supuesto desde el que este trabajo se plantea. Adicionalmente, se entiende que el espacio es relevante para comprender los fenómenos sociales en los que el Trabajo Social interviene, y respecto de su mismo quehacer, como ha planteado Saravia (2019a), en consonancia con producción internacional reciente en el campo del Trabajo Social (Bryant y Williams 2020;Williams 2016;Spatscheck y Wolf-Ostermann 2009). Podría decirse, de hecho, que la dimensión espacial ha sido abordada en el Trabajo Social siempre: "podría decirse que la investigación y la práctica del Trabajo Social siempre han estado atentas al lugar y al espacio.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Porque, si bien es cierto que trabajos como los de Lefebvre (2013) y Harvey (2012) tratan el concepto espacio en sí mismo, su aplicabilidad para pensar fenómenos o procesos de intervención específicos pareciera requerir una mediación conceptual que lo operativice. Por esta razón, en el Trabajo Social, salvo algunas excepciones (Bryant y Williams 2020;Saravia 2019aSaravia , 2019bSaravia , 2021Saravia, Urquieta y Ortega 2020;Crath 2012;Fairbanks 2003), es más común encontrar trabajos que utilizan conceptos como ambiente, lugar, territorio y, en menor medida, paisaje.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified