2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pixelated detectors and improved efficiency for magnetic imaging in STEM differential phase contrast

Abstract: The application of differential phase contrast imaging to the study of polycrystalline magnetic thin films and nanostructures has been hampered by the strong diffraction contrast resulting from the granular structure of the materials. In this paper we demonstrate how a pixelated detector has been used to detect the bright field disk in aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and subsequent processing of the acquired data allows efficient enhancement of the magnetic contrast in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the Sobel filter is a simple matrix, it can be applied across datasets without concern for effects caused by changing user defined thresholds, and is much faster and impartial than an iterative method. Sobel filtering has been shown to improve cross correlation accuracy of the forward scattered disk, useful in differential phase contrast imaging, but has not been robustly tested with diffracted disks containing dynamical contrast [26].…”
Section: Methods For Determining Diffraction Disk Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Sobel filter is a simple matrix, it can be applied across datasets without concern for effects caused by changing user defined thresholds, and is much faster and impartial than an iterative method. Sobel filtering has been shown to improve cross correlation accuracy of the forward scattered disk, useful in differential phase contrast imaging, but has not been robustly tested with diffracted disks containing dynamical contrast [26].…”
Section: Methods For Determining Diffraction Disk Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent progress in electron detectors, in particular in pixelated detectors with direct single-electron counting capabilities, have led recently to a new paradigm in transmission electron microscopy by improving the detection efficiency by orders of magnitude (Kü hlbrandt, 2014;McMullan et al, 2009). Indeed, the excellent results from McMullan et al (2007) and Nederlof et al (2013) have driven the very recent developments and the commercialization of hybrid pixel detectors in transmission electron microscopes (Quantum Detectors, 2017;Dectris, 2017;Amsterdam Scientific Instruments, 2017) and scanning transmission electron microscopes (Krajnak et al, 2016;Raighne et al, 2011) at high kinetic energies (40-300 keV) and less stringent vacuum constraints. Also, single-photon-counting pixel detectors like PILATUS (Kraft et al, 2009), EIGER (Dinapoli et al, 2011) and Medipix (Llopart et al, 2002;Gimenez et al, 2015) are widely used in photon science and synchrotron experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This diffraction contrast completely masks the magnetic contrast in standard DPC, however, the more advanced processing enabled by pixelated detectors can reduce this contrast and allow for successful quantitative imaging with DPC. [44][45][46] As outlined in existing studies, [45,46] the beam Lorentz deflection angle β from perpendicularly magnetized materials depends on the sample tilt and is proportional to B s . Figure 5a shows a DPC image from a 5 × 10 16 ions per cm 2 defect site on sample 1 in a field of 10 mT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%