2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.03.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pixel Based Image Forensic Technique for Copy-move Forgery Detection Using Auto Color Correlogram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed work includes noise filtering, transformation, auto color correlogram for extraction feature, matching forgery detection similarities, Malviya et al [36] (2016). The result shows that accuracy is only 95.65 % with a false positive rate of 16 and a false negative rate of 32 by testing 400 images from the database [37].…”
Section: International Journal Of Engineering and Advanced Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed work includes noise filtering, transformation, auto color correlogram for extraction feature, matching forgery detection similarities, Malviya et al [36] (2016). The result shows that accuracy is only 95.65 % with a false positive rate of 16 and a false negative rate of 32 by testing 400 images from the database [37].…”
Section: International Journal Of Engineering and Advanced Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of some selected recent research utilizing Euclidean distance during their feature matching stage were proposed in [61], [9], [60], [37], [45]. Instead of Euclidean distance, Malviya and Ladhake, in [66] and [78], utilized Manhattan distance [79] as an alternative to Euclidean distance to determine the relationship between pairs of matching features. Hosny et al [9] utilizes Euclidean distance with correlation technique to compare between a pair of PCET moments-based feature descriptors.…”
Section: B Similarity Measuring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They divided an image into blocks, extracted the color moment of each block and then clustered them into some classes. Malviya et al [39] exploited a CBIR feature extraction scheme to detect a typical forgery by employing Auto Correlogram their work has significant accuracy to detect the forged region. They focus on color content in forges image and extract features and then analyze the color moments and HSV color space of the tampered image [40] .Su et al [41] made a comparison between RGB and HSV color space for image retrieval.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%