2013
DOI: 10.12944/crnfsj.1.1.07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of Using Body Mass Index (BMI) in Assessment of Obesity Risk

Abstract: This review focuses on the potential drawbacks of using body mass index (BMI) which are often overlooked in the assessment of overweight or obesity risk, with special emphasis on the use of other equally important anthropometric measurements such as waist circumference (WC), waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and skin-fold thicknesses. There have been inconsistencies in findings when using BMI as an indicator of obesity risk. These have arisen mainly due to gender, age and ethnic differences in body fat composition and dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Older adults also frequently experience a loss of height over time. Due to these factors, BMI may be a less sensitive indicator of obesity in older adults (Bhurosy & Jeewon, 2013). For this reason it is recommended that BMI be used together with other measures of fatness such as WC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Older adults also frequently experience a loss of height over time. Due to these factors, BMI may be a less sensitive indicator of obesity in older adults (Bhurosy & Jeewon, 2013). For this reason it is recommended that BMI be used together with other measures of fatness such as WC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome variables used in the present study were food insecurity, BMI (kg/m 2 ), and WC (cm). Because BMI is limited as an indicator of obesity, especially in older adults (Bhurosy & Jeewon, 2013), it has been recommended that it be used alongside other measures that may better reflect abdominal adiposity, such as WC. Therefore, we included both measures in the present study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 BMI is a marker of general obesity 36 and is the method commonly used to determine obesity in social science research 37 even though the measure is criticized for lack of gender-, age-, and ethnicity-based cutoffs tailored to specific populations. 38 …”
Section: Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health risks based on WHR is classified into low risk, moderate risk and high risk 16 . Low risk is WHR < 0.95 and < 0.80 for men and women, respectively, whereas moderate risk is WHR of 0.96-1.00 in men and 0.81-0.85 in women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low risk is WHR < 0.95 and < 0.80 for men and women, respectively, whereas moderate risk is WHR of 0.96-1.00 in men and 0.81-0.85 in women. Nevertheless, high risk is recorded when WHR > 1.00 in men and > 0.85 in women 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%