2017
DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of the duplex system: the mystery of the missing stone

Abstract: A duplex ureter constitutes about 1% of the renal tract anomalies.A 39-year-old man presented with a 4-week history of left loin pain and microscopic haematuria. Investigation with a non-contrast CT KUB revealed a 6 mm non-obstructing calculus in the left distal ureter.Left ureteroscopy and lithotripsy was planned. However, ureteroscopy failed to identify the calculus. A double J ureteric stent was left in situ and the procedure abandoned in favour of further assessment with a CT urogram. Imaging surprisingly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in most of the patients with impacted ureteric stone of the duplicated ureter, similar to our case, most of the anomalies can be detected only in the theater during the procedure of ureteroscopic stone extraction. In such cases there is a high possibility for the ureteric anomaly to be missed and hence the calculus will not to be accessed [8]. Indeed in our search in the English medical literature many of the treated patients of the impacted calculus in a duplicated ureter in a single limb or in both limbs patient required a subsequent definitive further treatment [7,8,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, in most of the patients with impacted ureteric stone of the duplicated ureter, similar to our case, most of the anomalies can be detected only in the theater during the procedure of ureteroscopic stone extraction. In such cases there is a high possibility for the ureteric anomaly to be missed and hence the calculus will not to be accessed [8]. Indeed in our search in the English medical literature many of the treated patients of the impacted calculus in a duplicated ureter in a single limb or in both limbs patient required a subsequent definitive further treatment [7,8,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases there is a high possibility for the ureteric anomaly to be missed and hence the calculus will not to be accessed [8]. Indeed in our search in the English medical literature many of the treated patients of the impacted calculus in a duplicated ureter in a single limb or in both limbs patient required a subsequent definitive further treatment [7,8,10]. Usually this may prolong the hospital stay and consequently increase the cost of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fact that the ureteric bud divides prematurely before penetrating into metanephric blastema will result in duplex ureter. [ 1 ] There are 2 types of complete and incomplete duplex ureter. The incidence of incomplete duplex ureter, including 3 subtypes, such as proximal, middle, and distal, depending on the location that bifid ureters join a single unit, is 3 times more than the complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A duplex ureter occurs with an incidence of approximately 0.8% and is the most common anomaly, and calculus in the duplicated ureter is also a common entity. [ 1 ] Although asymptomatic patients with duplex ureter could be found incidentally by excretory urography, ultrosonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), preoperative assessment of the anatomic variations and function of duplex renal and ureters is often difficult in symptomatic patients with urinary obstruction, vesicoureteral reflux, and urinary tract infection. [ 2 ] To our knowledge, there are very few case reports in literature documenting a patient with multiple calculi obstruction in bifid ureter, resulting in severe hydronephrosis of both moieties and urinary tract infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%