2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of high-pass filtering for detecting epileptic oscillations: A technical note on “false” ripples

Abstract: HAL is a multidisciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
288
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
288
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time lag between two consecutive cycles had to be between 5 and 12.5 ms for ripples and between 2 and 4 ms for fast ripples (250-500 Hz). Oscillatory events containing overlapping ripples and fast ripples were excluded from the analysis (Bénar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time lag between two consecutive cycles had to be between 5 and 12.5 ms for ripples and between 2 and 4 ms for fast ripples (250-500 Hz). Oscillatory events containing overlapping ripples and fast ripples were excluded from the analysis (Bénar et al, 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HFOs were kept for analysis only if the oscillatory event was visible in either the 80-200 or 250-500 Hz range. Overlapping events, which may be caused by the filtering of sharp spikes (Bénar et al, 2010), were excluded from the analysis. HFO rates were obtained for each ictal discharge and interictal discharge in the anterior and posterior subregions of the piriform cortex.…”
Section: Detection and Analysis Of High-frequency Oscillatory Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, special care was taken to avoid the detection of false HFOs, since ripples were kept for analysis only if they were visible in the 80 -200 Hz range, whereas fast ripples were kept only if they were visible in the 250 -500 Hz range. Overlapping events, which may be caused by the filtering of sharp spikes (Bénar et al, 2010), were thus excluded from the analysis. Visual validation was also performed to eliminate the false positive created by movement artifacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%