2014
DOI: 10.1177/1457496914529275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of femoral Titanium Elastic Nailing

Abstract: Background and Aims: Despite several potential complications of elastic intramedullary nailing, it is currently the treatment of choice for femoral diaphyseal fractures in schoolaged children. this study aimed to critically evaluate the complications of titanium elastic nailing in pediatric femoral shaft fractures.Material and Methods: this study evaluated patients with a diaphyseal femoral fracture treated with titanium elastic nailing (ten) in tampere university Hospital in finland. the study group included … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of distal fractures, stabilization is more difficult and several approaches are possible [ 5 7 ]: retrograde C-shaped approach, with the convex side of both nails at the level of the fracture. The unbent nails are inserted into the medullary canal, and when the distance to the fracture site is equal to the length of the nails outside the bone, their bending is performed; retrograde C-shaped approach, in which the nails are crossed proximally to the fracture site; antegrade approach with C- and S-shaped nails.…”
Section: Femoral Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of distal fractures, stabilization is more difficult and several approaches are possible [ 5 7 ]: retrograde C-shaped approach, with the convex side of both nails at the level of the fracture. The unbent nails are inserted into the medullary canal, and when the distance to the fracture site is equal to the length of the nails outside the bone, their bending is performed; retrograde C-shaped approach, in which the nails are crossed proximally to the fracture site; antegrade approach with C- and S-shaped nails.…”
Section: Femoral Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Femoral neck fractures do not have an indication for ESIN because of the high density of the trabecular bone in the proximal femoral metaphysis, which makes the advancement and insertion of elastic nails difficult [ 5 7 ].…”
Section: Femoral Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this method has very few restrictions, therefore it can be used in almost every age group. However, there are some authors claiming this method to be overly and uncontrollably used [43][44][45] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although generally considered to be a safe procedure, complications have been reported after the fixation of pediatric femur fractures with intramedullary implants and include pain at nail insertion site, nail prominence, superficial and deep infections, mal-angulation, hematoma, neurologic damage, delayed union or nonunion, and loss of reduction [ 4 , 14 , 15 ]. Previously reported risk factors for complications and poor outcomes include older age, increased weight [ 3 , 4 ], improper sizing of the nail [ 16 ], and type of nail (rigid antegrade vs. elastic retrograde) [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%