1991
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of Biomechanical Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While cement augmentation techniques have, in the past, been felt to represent an aggressive approach to extreme clinical situations, clinical studies have shown augmentation to be safe (no extravasation) when performed properly. [33][34][35][36] For the most part, studies of augmentation have been limited to situations involving salvage surgery after screw pullout. 37,38 For example, Zindrick et al 39 compared pullout strength when nonpressurized and pressurized polymethyl methacrylate was used to augment revision pedicle screws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cement augmentation techniques have, in the past, been felt to represent an aggressive approach to extreme clinical situations, clinical studies have shown augmentation to be safe (no extravasation) when performed properly. [33][34][35][36] For the most part, studies of augmentation have been limited to situations involving salvage surgery after screw pullout. 37,38 For example, Zindrick et al 39 compared pullout strength when nonpressurized and pressurized polymethyl methacrylate was used to augment revision pedicle screws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 To avoid these problems, calf thoracic spines were used in this study. Calf spines have been widely used for in vitro testing because previous studies have shown significant anatomic and mechanical similarities between human and calf models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biologische Verwesungs- Vorgänge des Präparates limitieren die Versuchsdauer auf maximal 100 000 Zyklen bei der empfohlenen Frequenz von 5 Hz [2], Frühversager unter den Implantaten können vielfach bereits nach 10 000 Zyklen ermittelt werden. Der verwendete, nicht destruktive Versuchsaufbau gibt bessere Auskunft über die Implantatstabilität als einfache Lastauszugsversuche [2,6,8,10].…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified