2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0049-3848(17)30075-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in the diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both methods are at risk of inconclusive results, but among pregnant patients this probability is higher for angio-CT. However, in pregnant women with abnormal chest X-ray, the rate of nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans is significantly higher [ 14 , 16 ]. There are two ongoing trials aimed at clarifying unsolved issues of the diagnostic pathway in pregnant women [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both methods are at risk of inconclusive results, but among pregnant patients this probability is higher for angio-CT. However, in pregnant women with abnormal chest X-ray, the rate of nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans is significantly higher [ 14 , 16 ]. There are two ongoing trials aimed at clarifying unsolved issues of the diagnostic pathway in pregnant women [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both maternal and fetal radiation exposure are low using modern imaging techniques (table 12) [385,[392][393][394][395][396][397][398]. For V/Q scans and CTPA, fetal radiation doses are well below the threshold associated with fetal radiation complications (which is 50-100 mSv) [399,400]. In the past, CTPA has been reported to cause high radiation exposure to the breast [395,401]; however, CT technology has evolved, and several techniques can now reduce radiation exposure without compromising image quality.…”
Section: Imaging Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific cutoffs to be used for pregnant women and children have also been proposed [106,122,123]. However, as Ddimer increases physiologically throughout pregnancy, the identification of an accurate D-dimer diagnostic threshold will be challenging [124]. The Diagnosis of PE in Pregnancy (DiPEP) biomarker study recently showed that no biomarker has diagnostic efficiency for diagnosing VTE in pregnancy or in the puerperium [125].…”
Section: D-dimer Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of suspicion of PE, because imaging tests may expose the mother and the fetus to radiation, the ability to rule-out PE with non-radiologic tests is crucial [107]. To improve the usefulness of D-dimer results, specific cutoffs have been proposed, but not yet validated, in a large prospective study [124]. However, once again, a negative D-dimer result keeps its sensitivity and NPV [107].…”
Section: Vte Diagnosis In Specific Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%