2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.02.20205583
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in EEG analysis in patients with non-convulsive status epilepticus

Abstract: Objective. Electroencephalography (EEG) interpretations through visual (by human raters) and automated (by computer technology) analysis are still not reliable for the diagnosis of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). This study aimed to identify typical pitfalls in the EEG analysis and make suggestions as to how those pitfalls might be avoided. Methods. We analyzed the EEG recordings of individuals who had clinically confirmed or suspected NCSE. Epileptiform EEG activity during seizures (ictal discharge… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the EEG recordings of adults living in a residential care setting and out-patient children during NCSE were analyzed. We retrieved clinical records and EEG recordings from 20 participants diagnosed as NCSE during the period from 2008 to 2016 at the EEG department of Kempenhaeghe, a specialized epilepsy center in the Netherlands (Wang et al 2020). After a recheck on the recordings by a neurologist specialized in epilepsy, four participants were excluded because of non-traceable EEG recording (n = 1), misdiagnosis for symptoms suspected to be NCSE (n = 2), and no consent for scientific research (n = 1).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the EEG recordings of adults living in a residential care setting and out-patient children during NCSE were analyzed. We retrieved clinical records and EEG recordings from 20 participants diagnosed as NCSE during the period from 2008 to 2016 at the EEG department of Kempenhaeghe, a specialized epilepsy center in the Netherlands (Wang et al 2020). After a recheck on the recordings by a neurologist specialized in epilepsy, four participants were excluded because of non-traceable EEG recording (n = 1), misdiagnosis for symptoms suspected to be NCSE (n = 2), and no consent for scientific research (n = 1).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a recheck on the recordings by a neurologist specialized in epilepsy, four participants were excluded because of non-traceable EEG recording (n = 1), misdiagnosis for symptoms suspected to be NCSE (n = 2), and no consent for scientific research (n = 1). Ictal discharges during NCSE which were longer than 20 s were annotated by two independent raters and categorized into five morphological patterns ('Spike Wave' , 'Wave' , 'Fast Spike' , 'EMG-like Discharges' , and 'Unknown Type') based on their dominant discharge patterns (Wang et al 2017a(Wang et al , 2020. Interrater agreements were measured using Cohen's kappa and Fleiss' kappa (Wang et al 2020).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations