Pitfalls and major issues in the histologic diagnosis of peripheral T‐cell lymphomas: results of the central review of 573 cases from the T‐Cell Project, an international, cooperative study

Abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that are derived from post-thymic lymphoid cells at different stages of differentiation with different morphological patterns, phenotypes and clinical presentations. PTCLs are highly diverse, reflecting the diverse cells from which they can originate and are currently sub-classified using World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 criteria. In 2006 the International T-Cell Lymphoma Project launched the T-Cell Project, building on the retrospective study previously carried on by the network, with the aim to prospectively collect accurate data to improve knowledge on this group of lymphomas. Based on previously published reports from International Study Groups it emerged that rendering a correct classification of PTCLs is quite difficult because the relatively low prevalence of these diseases results in a lack of confidence by most pathologists. This is the reason why the T-Cell Project requested the availability of diagnostic material from the initial biopsy of each patient registered in the study in order to have the initial diagnosis centrally reviewed by expert hematopathologists. In the present report the results of the review process performed on 573 cases are presented. Overall, an incorrect diagnosis was centrally recorded in 13.1% cases, including 8.5% cases centrally reclassified with a subtype eligible for the project and 4.6% cases misclassified and found to be disorders other than T-cell lymphomas; 2.1% cases were centrally classified as T-Cell disorders not included in the study population. Thus, the T-Cell Project confirmed the difficulties in providing an accurate classification when a diagnosis of PTCLs is suspected, singled out the major pitfalls that can bias a correct histologic categorization and confirmed that a centralized expert review with the application of adequate diagnostic algorithms is mandatory when dealing with these tumours. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Analysis of Judicial Precedents Cases Regarding Skin Cancer from 1997 to 2017 in Republic of Korea

“…Peripheral T cell lymphoma was diagnosed based on the World Health Organization classification system along with clinical and laboratory information. Some cases are difficult to diagnose correctly 25 . In this regard, the judge sentenced that the patient being younger and without nodal involvement or any typical laboratory result, it was difficult to diagnose peripheral T cell lymphoma.…”

EBV and the Pathogenesis of NK/T Cell Lymphoma

“…In Europe and North America ENKTCL accounts for less than 1% of all Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL), whereas in Asian countries and Latin American countries it is more frequent representing 2 to 15% of NHL [3][4][5][6]. A recent study from the T cell lymphoma project, an international cooperative study, demonstrated NK cell malignant lymphoproliferations accounted for 2 to 5.1% of all T and NK cell lymphomas in North America, 1 to 4.3% in Europeans, and higher rates in Asian populations of 22.4 to 22.5% [37]. Aozasa et al estimated that the frequency of ENKTCL is 10-fold higher in Asian populations when compared to Europeans [38].…”

Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the College of American Pathologists

“…Table 5 lists lymphoma subtypes by the degree of difficulty in their classification. [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90] Multiple studies show that secondary reviews in pathology increase the diagnostic accuracy. The EP recommends that institutions incorporate their own peer review processes into their quality assurance programs.…”