Pitching non-English language research: A dual-language application of the Pitching Research Framework

Faff, Robert W.; Shao, Xuefeng; Alqahtani, Faisal; Atif, Muhammad; Białek‐Jaworska, Anna; Chen, Angela; Duppati, Geeta; Escobar, Marisol; Finta, Marinela Adriana; Jeny, Anne; Li, Ya; Machado, Márcio André Veras; Nishi, Takahiro; Nguyen, Bao Hoang; Noh, Jae-Eun; Reichenecker, Jurij-Andrei; Sakawa, Hideaki; Vaportzis, Eleftheria; Widyawati, Luluk; Wijayana, Singgih; Wijesooriya, Chinthake; Ye, George; Zhou, Qing

doi:10.24818/jamis.2018.02005

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Ambiguity Of Terminology and Repetitiveness1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, a primary example of this entreaty is the qualitative adaptation of Lodhia (2019). Further, other variations of the research template design include: (i) the Pitching Research for Engagement and Impact framework (Faff et al, 2020), (ii) language translations (Faff et al, 2018) and (iii) journal article abstracts (Hale et al, 2018;Faff, 2019b).…”

Section: Ambiguity Of Terminology and Repetitivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

… More on the use of research templates

Faff

Lodhia

2021

Accounting & Finance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motivated by Bui's thought-provoking analysis regarding the perceived efficacy of research templates, our paper advances the debate by reviewing Faff's Pitching Research Ò framework and Lodhia's qualitative companion. The key premises of these research templates are highlighted and potential misconceptions are addressed. We reach common ground on the underlying philosophy and use of research templates for quantitative and qualitative research; and, more generally, on the process of research. As such, we provide a pathway for reducing the schism between the two 'rival' research camps.

show abstract

Section: Ambiguity Of Terminology and Repetitivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%