2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl089926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitch‐Angle Scattering of Inner Magnetospheric Electrons Caused by ECH Waves Obtained With the Arase Satellite

Abstract: Electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) waves are generally excited in the magnetic equator region, in the sector from nightside to dayside during geomagnetically active conditions, and cause the pitch angle scattering by cyclotron resonance. The scattered electrons precipitate into the Earth's atmosphere and cause auroral emission. However, there is no observational evidence that ECH waves actually scatter electrons into the loss cone in the magnetosphere. In this study, from simultaneous wave and par… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies demonstrated that the contribution of ECH waves to approaching strong diffusion is relatively small compared with LBC and UBC waves (Khazanov et al, 2015;Tao et al, 2011;Thorne et al, 2010; 2021) identified that both LBC and UBC waves contribute to the electron PA scattering close to the equator via Arase observations. On the other hand, the PA scattering of keV electrons in a loss cone by ECH waves had been reported using ground-based all-sky imager and Arase satellite observations (Fukizawa et al, 2018(Fukizawa et al, , 2020. Although these previous studies are based on case studies, our study is based on statistical analyses of data obtained with a relatively high-angular-resolution electron instrument onboard the Arase satellite.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies demonstrated that the contribution of ECH waves to approaching strong diffusion is relatively small compared with LBC and UBC waves (Khazanov et al, 2015;Tao et al, 2011;Thorne et al, 2010; 2021) identified that both LBC and UBC waves contribute to the electron PA scattering close to the equator via Arase observations. On the other hand, the PA scattering of keV electrons in a loss cone by ECH waves had been reported using ground-based all-sky imager and Arase satellite observations (Fukizawa et al, 2018(Fukizawa et al, , 2020. Although these previous studies are based on case studies, our study is based on statistical analyses of data obtained with a relatively high-angular-resolution electron instrument onboard the Arase satellite.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These relatively high-energy precipitating electrons cannot produce the enhancement of electron density in the F region. We suggest that the electron density enhancement in the F region with electron temperature increase would be caused by precipitating electrons with energies lower than 1 keV, and these low-energy electrons are generated by UBC and/or ECH waves and the backscattered primary and secondary electrons in the opposite hemisphere (Evans et al, 1987;Fukizawa et al, 2020Fukizawa et al, , 2018Inan et al, 1992;Khazanov et al, 2014;Miyoshi et al, 2015). Figure 10b indicates that the electron density enhancements in the E and F regions have a positive correlation.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The occurrence rate of Diffuse peaked in the morning sector, which is also consistent with previous studies 4 , 14 , 27 , 32 , 33 . Diffuse auroras could originate due to magnetospheric waves, such as chorus 34 37 and electrostatic electron cyclotron harmonic (ECH) waves 38 , 39 , the former often being widely distributed from the midnight to noon sector 40 and the latter from the pre-midnight to morning sector 41 . In panel (e), the occurrence rate of diffuse auroras decreased in the morning sector owing to the effect of sunlight, but their occurrence over a wide range of UT was generally consistent with the distribution of the magnetospheric waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%