2003
DOI: 10.1104/pp.014100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pit Membrane Porosity and Water Stress-Induced Cavitation in Four Co-Existing Dry Rainforest Tree Species

Abstract: Aspects of xylem anatomy and vulnerability to water stress-induced embolism were examined in stems of two droughtdeciduous species, Brachychiton australis (Schott and Endl.) A. Terracc. and Cochlospermum gillivraei Benth., and two evergreen species, Alphitonia excelsa (Fenzal) Benth. and Austromyrtus bidwillii (Benth.) Burret., growing in a seasonally dry rainforest. The deciduous species were more vulnerable to water stress-induced xylem embolism. B. australis and C. gillivraei reached a 50% loss of hydraulic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
206
1
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
20
206
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the increase of N pit may imply a lower cavitation resistance because the occurrence and size of large pit membrane pores is thought to increase with the total pit membrane area per vessel (Wheeler et al 2005). On the other hand, membrane pores often have similar sizes among species, and the rare largest membrane pore per vessel determines the level of safety against cavitation (Choat et al 2003). Thus, the smaller surface area of intervessel pits that we found may limit the area of the pit membrane and decrease the chance of occurrence of large pores in the membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the increase of N pit may imply a lower cavitation resistance because the occurrence and size of large pit membrane pores is thought to increase with the total pit membrane area per vessel (Wheeler et al 2005). On the other hand, membrane pores often have similar sizes among species, and the rare largest membrane pore per vessel determines the level of safety against cavitation (Choat et al 2003). Thus, the smaller surface area of intervessel pits that we found may limit the area of the pit membrane and decrease the chance of occurrence of large pores in the membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species differences in cavitation vulnerability may be related to the degree of stomata control, i.e. iso-versus anisohydric species (Tardieu and Simonneau 1998), differences in xylem structure (Sperry 2003;Choat et al 2003) and xylem embolism repair mechanisms (Zwieniecki and Holbrook 2009).…”
Section: Plant Properties and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracheids with more or larger pits are rare in living plants but widespread in extinct groups, including Lyginopteris, Medullosa, Callistophyton, Cordaites, early conifers (Philippe and Bamford 2008), tgigantopterids (Li and Taylor 1998), and the Mesozoic seed plant Pentoxylon (Taylor and Taylor 1993). The drawbacks to increased pit area may have included decreased structural support from thinner cell walls (Hacke et al 2001a, Pittermann et al 2006b) and an increased probability that embolisms would spread because of microfibril failure, leaving large pores in pit membranes (Choat et al 2003). …”
Section: Wilson -25mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pit membrane porosity is based on values estimated from direct measurement or inferred from whole-plant measurements (Choat et al 2003, Choat et al 2006, Choat et al 2004). …”
Section: Materials and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%