Abstract:Resting state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) is a widespread and powerful tool for investigating functional connectivity (FC) and brain disorders. However, FC analysis can be seriously affected by random and structured noise from non-neural sources, such as physiology. Thus, it is essential to first reduce thermal noise and then correctly identify and remove non-neural artifacts from rs-fMRI signals through optimized data processing methods. However, existing tools that correct for these effects have been developed … Show more
“…First, that GSR does not result in a plain mathematical demeaning of FC matrices but contributes to highlighting genuine (anti-)correlations across the brain, should they exist. This finding is in agreement with recent studiesboth in humans and rodentsshowing that ICA cleaning + GSR also improves the differentiation between populations based on resting-state patterns compared to ICA cleaning alone (29,38). While GSR is known to mathematically favor anti-correlations (39), there is also evidence of genuine anti-correlations in BOLD resting-state functional connectivity, which are reportedly related to certain brain networks being specifically inactivated while other networks are active, for accrued efficiency ( 40), e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI, following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning (29, 68, 69) with high-pass temporal filtering (f > 0.01 Hz) and 40 independent components, or both. For group analyses, resting-state functional connectivity matrices were averaged across subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI. The correlation coefficients were calculated following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning (Beckmann and Smith, 2004;Griffanti et al, 2017;Diao et al, 2021) or both. Group analyses were done averaging the resting-state functional connectivity matrices across the subjects.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notoriously low sensitivity of dfMRI is balanced by recent improvements in spatio-temporal resolution of the acquisition (e.g. stronger gradients on clinical systems and multi-slice acceleration) and in image pre-processing, in particular Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MP-PCA) denoising (Veraart et al, 2016;Ades-Aron et al, 2021;Diao et al, 2021) to boost the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If at least 20 voxels in the ROI had a zstatistic > 3.1, the estimated response function was taken to the group analysis. For the calculation of group averages, subject-level estimates were first normalized using the 8 seconds before the stimulus onset as baseline.RS fMRI analysis.Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI, following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning(29,68,69) with high-pass temporal filtering (f > 0.01 Hz) and 40 independent components, or both. For group analyses, resting-state functional connectivity matrices were averaged across subjects.…”
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is an essential method to measure brain activity non-invasively. While fMRI almost systematically relies on the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast, there is an increasing interest in alternative methods that would not rely on neurovascular coupling. A promising but controversial such alternative is diffusion fMRI (dfMRI), which relies instead on dynamic fluctuations in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) due to microstructural changes underlying neuronal activity. However, it is unclear whether genuine dfMRI contrast, distinct from BOLD contamination, can be detected in the human brain in physiological conditions. Here, we present the first dfMRI study in humans attempting to minimize all BOLD contamination sources and comparing functional responses at two field strengths (3T and 7T), both for task and resting-state (RS) fMRI. Our study benefits from unprecedented high spatiotemporal resolution and harnesses novel denoising strategies. We report task-induced decrease in ADC with temporal and spatial features distinct from the BOLD response and yielding more specific activation maps. Furthermore, we report dfMRI RS connectivity which, compared to its BOLD counterpart, is essentially free from physiological artifacts and preserves positive correlations but preferentially suppresses anti-correlations, which are likely of vascular origin. A careful acquisition and processing design thus enable the detection of genuine dfMRI contrast on clinical MRI systems. As opposed to BOLD, diffusion functional contrast could be particularly well suited for low-field MRI.
“…First, that GSR does not result in a plain mathematical demeaning of FC matrices but contributes to highlighting genuine (anti-)correlations across the brain, should they exist. This finding is in agreement with recent studiesboth in humans and rodentsshowing that ICA cleaning + GSR also improves the differentiation between populations based on resting-state patterns compared to ICA cleaning alone (29,38). While GSR is known to mathematically favor anti-correlations (39), there is also evidence of genuine anti-correlations in BOLD resting-state functional connectivity, which are reportedly related to certain brain networks being specifically inactivated while other networks are active, for accrued efficiency ( 40), e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI, following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning (29, 68, 69) with high-pass temporal filtering (f > 0.01 Hz) and 40 independent components, or both. For group analyses, resting-state functional connectivity matrices were averaged across subjects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI. The correlation coefficients were calculated following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning (Beckmann and Smith, 2004;Griffanti et al, 2017;Diao et al, 2021) or both. Group analyses were done averaging the resting-state functional connectivity matrices across the subjects.…”
Section: Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notoriously low sensitivity of dfMRI is balanced by recent improvements in spatio-temporal resolution of the acquisition (e.g. stronger gradients on clinical systems and multi-slice acceleration) and in image pre-processing, in particular Marchenko-Pastur PCA (MP-PCA) denoising (Veraart et al, 2016;Ades-Aron et al, 2021;Diao et al, 2021) to boost the temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If at least 20 voxels in the ROI had a zstatistic > 3.1, the estimated response function was taken to the group analysis. For the calculation of group averages, subject-level estimates were first normalized using the 8 seconds before the stimulus onset as baseline.RS fMRI analysis.Pair-wise Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the mean time-courses across each ROI, following global signal regression (GSR), manual independent component analysis (ICA) cleaning(29,68,69) with high-pass temporal filtering (f > 0.01 Hz) and 40 independent components, or both. For group analyses, resting-state functional connectivity matrices were averaged across subjects.…”
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is an essential method to measure brain activity non-invasively. While fMRI almost systematically relies on the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast, there is an increasing interest in alternative methods that would not rely on neurovascular coupling. A promising but controversial such alternative is diffusion fMRI (dfMRI), which relies instead on dynamic fluctuations in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) due to microstructural changes underlying neuronal activity. However, it is unclear whether genuine dfMRI contrast, distinct from BOLD contamination, can be detected in the human brain in physiological conditions. Here, we present the first dfMRI study in humans attempting to minimize all BOLD contamination sources and comparing functional responses at two field strengths (3T and 7T), both for task and resting-state (RS) fMRI. Our study benefits from unprecedented high spatiotemporal resolution and harnesses novel denoising strategies. We report task-induced decrease in ADC with temporal and spatial features distinct from the BOLD response and yielding more specific activation maps. Furthermore, we report dfMRI RS connectivity which, compared to its BOLD counterpart, is essentially free from physiological artifacts and preserves positive correlations but preferentially suppresses anti-correlations, which are likely of vascular origin. A careful acquisition and processing design thus enable the detection of genuine dfMRI contrast on clinical MRI systems. As opposed to BOLD, diffusion functional contrast could be particularly well suited for low-field MRI.
Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H‐MRSI) is a powerful tool that enables the multidimensional non‐invasive mapping of the neurochemical profile at high resolution over the entire brain. The constant demand for higher spatial resolution in 1H‐MRSI has led to increased interest in post‐processing‐based denoising methods aimed at reducing noise variance. The aim of the present study was to implement two noise‐reduction techniques, Marchenko–Pastur principal component analysis (MP‐PCA) based denoising and low‐rank total generalized variation (LR‐TGV) reconstruction, and to test their potential with and impact on preclinical 14.1 T fast in vivo 1H‐FID‐MRSI datasets. Since there is no known ground truth for in vivo metabolite maps, additional evaluations of the performance of both noise‐reduction strategies were conducted using Monte Carlo simulations. Results showed that both denoising techniques increased the apparent signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) while preserving noise properties in each spectrum for both in vivo and Monte Carlo datasets. Relative metabolite concentrations were not significantly altered by either method and brain regional differences were preserved in both synthetic and in vivo datasets. Increased precision of metabolite estimates was observed for the two methods, with inconsistencies noted for lower‐concentration metabolites. Our study provided a framework for how to evaluate the performance of MP‐PCA and LR‐TGV methods for preclinical 1H‐FID MRSI data at 14.1 T. While gains in apparent SNR and precision were observed, concentration estimations ought to be treated with care, especially for low‐concentration metabolites.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.