Pipeline Programs Can Support Reforms in Medical Education: A Cohort Study of Alabama's Rural Health Leaders Pipeline to Engage Community Leaders

Abstract

Purpose:To demonstrate for county leaders the utility of rural pipelines to gain physicians and produce health professionals.Methods: This cohort study, 1993-2018, aggregated 1,051 students in the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline to their home counties (N = 67) to study the relationship between county participation in pipeline programs and outcomes of family physicians gained and health professionals produced. Additional county demographics were included. We conducted descriptive, bivariate, and multivariable linear regression analyses controlling for poverty, race, and rurality. Findings: All 67 Alabama counties participated with means of 9.6 Rural Health Scholars, 2.7 Rural Minority Health Scholars, 3.4 Rural Medical Scholars, 67% rural population, 29.7% Black population, and 21.5% under poverty. Best regression model for gaining family physicians included Rural Medical Scholars involved (b = 0.24, P < .001) with R 2 0.30, indicating a county gained 1 family physician for 4 students. Best model for health professionals included Rural Health Scholars involved (b = 0.20, P < .001) with R 2 0.31, indicating production of 1 health professional for 5 students. Best model for any professional included Rural Health Scholars involved (b = 0.23, P < .001) with R 2 0.35, indicating 1 professional produced for 4 students.Conclusions: Rural pipeline programs can be useful tools in medical education reform to benefit counties with the gain of family physicians and production of health professionals. Local public officials could use these findings, eg, 1 family physician gained for every 4 students a county involved in the pipeline, to advocate that health professional education employ such pipelines.

Efforts to Recruit Medical Students From Rural Counties: A Model to Evaluate Recruitment Efforts

“…Implications from this study have added to the body of evidence confirming the results of prior studies that rural applicants are equally likely or more likely to be admitted [ 6 , 15 , 22 - 24 ] but emphasize the need for more effective pathway programs encouraging more applicants from rural backgrounds. We defined success as the proportion of applicants from rural backgrounds aligning with the potential rural applicant pool.…”

Medical education for African American communities in the rural South: A focus group approach to identify fundamental considerations

“…Although this recommendation could apply to rural medical education elsewhere, it is especially recommended for supporting and securing the futures of rural AA health professionals who will likely be enlisted to ameliorate health inequities experienced in their home communities. These findings and recommendations reinforce the call for demonstration projects among rural minority populations to solidify the understanding of developments in medical education that improve their health 29 …”

“…Intersectionality of geographic location and race is crucial to diversifying medical schools with intention to improve health outcomes in areas where medical professionals are underrepresented and poor health outcomes are rampant. For example, evidence suggests that White physicians who are products of the Black Belt, 1 of the nation's most medically underserved areas, rarely return to practice in this area 29 . An increase in rural Black physician training and representation, specifically, is needed to facilitate improvements in health among rural AA, some of whom have a deep‐seated distrust of the health care system due to historical injustices, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study 38 .…”

Three Things Schools Should Do to Make Advancement Assessment Just

“…A culture of equity, however, cannot be limited to recruitment, admissions, and selection but must encompass curriculum, assessment, and career advancement milestones. Much of the focus in diversifying the physician workforce is on pathway programs to expand the applicant pool 14,15,16 and admissions processes such as multiple mini-interviews, 17 trainings to mitigate bias, 18,19 and holistic review 20 based on applicants' experiences, attributes, and metrics. Less research focuses on how to ensure a supportive and equitable learning environment for learners once they matriculate.…”