2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-016-3334-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of a traumatic intracranial aneurysm in a child

Abstract: Due to its dissecting nature, wall friability and lack of a substantial neck can make surgical clipping and selective coiling difficult and risky. Although endovascular parent artery occlusion is the best approach in the acute phase, in some situations it is not possible or very risky. In such scenario the use of flow diverter devices would be an alternative approach. Additionally, we discuss the potential advantages and risks of flow diverter deployment inside a developing vessel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissecting aneurysms are generally secondary to trauma, infection, or congenital diseases. [ 13 , 44 ] In our cases, there were no cases secondary to congenital diseases, vasculitis, collagen, or hematologic diseases, such as sickle cell anemia. Nevertheless, according to literature review, some of these diseases represent between 10 and 20% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dissecting aneurysms are generally secondary to trauma, infection, or congenital diseases. [ 13 , 44 ] In our cases, there were no cases secondary to congenital diseases, vasculitis, collagen, or hematologic diseases, such as sickle cell anemia. Nevertheless, according to literature review, some of these diseases represent between 10 and 20% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Even today, there are not many cases of PIAs in the world treated with FDs, nevertheless, the experience continues to grow. [4,9,13,19,21,27,[44][45][46][47] According to the literature review, it should be stated that the first case of a child treated with a pipeline device (PED) was reported in 2009 by Lylyk et al, along with other adult patients, but without providing specific details. [27] At early 2017, Barburoglu and Arat reported a successful use of FDs on five PIAs and in their review of reports around the world, they gathered information about 15 successful PIAs treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there have been only 52 reported cases of pediatric aneurysms treated with PEDs. 20,21 Of those, only 19 cases described treatment of pediatric pseudoaneurysms, 9,20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] with only 7 describing treatment of pseudoaneurysms presenting with hemorrhage (Table 3). 23,24,27,28,30 Colby et al 9 described treatment of a 9-month-old patient with a large middle cerebral artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to resection of an intrinsic brain tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Post-traumatic intracranial false aneurysms occurrence after a head injury have different localizations than nontraumatic ones. 10 Association between a false aneurysm and arachnoid cyst may be advantageous. One study suggests potential links with an ipsilateral lesion in case of associa-tion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only one case of a child aneurysm treated by a flow diverter stent has been published. 10 Stents have hemodynamic but also.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%