Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/isda.2006.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline Damage and Leak Detection Based on Sound Spectrum LPCC and HMM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning rate is set to Z ¼ 0:001. The detection performance of the proposed method is compared with that of LPCC method (Ai et al 2006) and SVM method (Toshitaka and Akira 2007). Table 3 gives the comparison result of detection performances.…”
Section: Detection Of Leak In the Presence Of Non-leak Noise Outside mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The learning rate is set to Z ¼ 0:001. The detection performance of the proposed method is compared with that of LPCC method (Ai et al 2006) and SVM method (Toshitaka and Akira 2007). Table 3 gives the comparison result of detection performances.…”
Section: Detection Of Leak In the Presence Of Non-leak Noise Outside mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Michael presented a method, which extracted a plurality of linear predictive coding cepstrum coefficients as the acoustic features to distinguish the leak signal from ambient non-leak noises (Seaford 1994). Ai et al adopted linear prediction cepstrum coefficient (LPCC) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to recognise leak acoustic signals (Ai et al 2006). Toshitaka and Akira proposed a leak detection method using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) (Toshitaka and Akira 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic leak detection techniques and equipments have been shown to be effective and are widely used in the water pipelines [1,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The conventional acoustic equipments include listening rods, geophones and ground microphones, and may be either mechanical or electronic [9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods were somewhat successful in detection leaks, but were incapable of differentiating alarms due to non-leak acoustic sources outside pipelines, such as machine noises and construction noises. Michael Savic (1995) presented an apparatus for determining the existence of a leak in an underground pipe, which extracted a plurality of linear predictive coding (LPC) cepstrum coefficients as the acoustic features to distinguish the leak signal from ambient acoustic signals [14]. Ai et al (2006) described a leak detection system based on linear prediction cepstrum coefficient (LPCC) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to recognize acoustic signals [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation