2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinning sampled-data control for synchronization of complex networks with probabilistic time-varying delays using quadratic convex approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The state trajectory of the isolated node α(t)s(t) (43) and network x i (t) (1) Remark 6 The networks in both examples of our study and the ones in the literature [21,32,39] are different. In [21], the FPS of the network is achieved under pinning feedback controller design but the concerned network is still undirected.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The state trajectory of the isolated node α(t)s(t) (43) and network x i (t) (1) Remark 6 The networks in both examples of our study and the ones in the literature [21,32,39] are different. In [21], the FPS of the network is achieved under pinning feedback controller design but the concerned network is still undirected.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It renders the control more reliable and handy in real world problems. In [29], one studied dissipative sampled-data control of uncertain nonlinear systems with timevarying delays, and so on [30][31][32][33][34]. Meanwhile, pinning control has been introduced to deal with the problem of large number of controllers added to large size of neural network structure [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the synchronization conditions have not appeared under the condition that randomness of controller gain fluctuation, nonfragile character, sampled‐data, uncertainty, and time‐delays are considered in the state‐feedback controller. Many control methods have appeared to achieve synchronization including state‐feedback control, 16 adaptive control, 17 pinning control, 18,19 sliding mode control, 20 intermittent control, 21 and so on. Fragility is the basic problem of performance degradation of the feedback control for CDNs due to the phenomenon of inaccuracies in the process of implementing controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analog signal treatment methods have been frequently replaced by digital signal handling methods to afford better stability in continuous-time systems. Thus, sampled-data systems have been a hot research topic and investigated extensively in the last decades [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In such systems, a digital computer is adopted to sample and quantize a continuous-time measurement signal to produce a discrete-time signal, and then produce a discrete-time control input signal, which is further converted back into a continuous-time control input signal using a zero-order hold (ZOH) [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%