Pinna Cues Determine Orienting Response Modes to Synchronous Sounds in Elevation

Abstract

To program a goal-directed orienting response toward a sound source embedded in an acoustic scene, the audiomotor system should detect and select the target against a background. Here, we focus on whether the system can segregate synchronous sounds in the midsagittal plane (elevation), a task requiring the auditory system to dissociate the pinna-induced spectral localization cues. Human listeners made rapid head-orienting responses toward either a single sound source (broadband buzzer or Gaussian noise) or toward two simultaneously presented sounds (buzzer and noise) at a wide variety of locations in the midsagittal plane. In the latter case, listeners had to orient to the buzzer (target) and ignore the noise (nontarget). In the single-sound condition, localization was accurate. However, in the double-sound condition, response endpoints depended on relative sound level and spatial disparity. The loudest sound dominated the responses, regardless of whether it was the target or the nontarget. When the sounds had about equal intensities and their spatial disparity was sufficiently small, endpoint distributions were well described by weighted averaging. However, when spatial disparities exceeded ϳ45°, response endpoint distributions became bimodal. Similar response behavior has been reported for visuomotor experiments, for which averaging and bimodal endpoint distributions are thought to arise from neural interactions within retinotopically organized visuomotor maps. We show, however, that the auditory-evoked responses can be well explained by the idiosyncratic acoustics of the pinnae. Hence basic principles of target representation and selection for audition and vision appear to differ profoundly.

Atypical vertical sound localization and sound-onset sensitivity in people with autism spectrum disorders

“…A custom developed toolbox 46 automatically detected responses using velocity and acceleration criteria. Some detected intervals needed manual adjustment.…”

Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception

“…Horizontal sound-localization performance was tested in the bimodal listening condition as described by Bremen et al (2010). Sounds were presented via a motorized hoop with 58 speakers that rotated around the subject's chair in a completely dark and soundattenuated room.…”

“…Sounds were presented via a motorized hoop with 58 speakers that rotated around the subject's chair in a completely dark and soundattenuated room. Subjects wore a custom-built spectacle frame with a small search coil attached to the nose bridge in order to record their head movements using the magnetic search-coil induction technique (Robinson, 1963;Bremen et al, 2010;Agterberg et al, 2011).…”

Age-related Hearing Loss and Ear Morphology Affect Vertical but not Horizontal Sound-Localization Performance

“…Following the procedure described in Bremen et al (2010), we sampled 58 locations in the frontal median plane (from −57.5 to 85°in elevation, for both ears) three times and averaged across identical locations to compute the raw HRTFs. Subsequently, the raw HRTFs were divided by the measured transfer functions of the microphones and speakers for calibration.…”