In the Studio 2020
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv125jsnh.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinewood Studios, the Independent Frame, and Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, as I have argued elsewhere, 'even though the Independent Frame experiment lasted only a few years, in the longer-term it contributed to the establishment of a robust technical infrastructure at Pinewood which laid the foundations for the studio's subsequent outstanding reputation for technical excellence as well as streamlined methods of production'. 60 This is a good example of what Edgerton terms 'use-centred' history, in which the uptake of technology is the dominant factor, rather than focusing solely on invention, to demonstrate how 'technologies do not only appear, they also reappear, and mix and match' across time. 61 In this way technicians' experience working with back projection technologies fed into travelling matte solutions, creating a circular link between past and present, research, development, and uptake.…”
Section: The Independent Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, as I have argued elsewhere, 'even though the Independent Frame experiment lasted only a few years, in the longer-term it contributed to the establishment of a robust technical infrastructure at Pinewood which laid the foundations for the studio's subsequent outstanding reputation for technical excellence as well as streamlined methods of production'. 60 This is a good example of what Edgerton terms 'use-centred' history, in which the uptake of technology is the dominant factor, rather than focusing solely on invention, to demonstrate how 'technologies do not only appear, they also reappear, and mix and match' across time. 61 In this way technicians' experience working with back projection technologies fed into travelling matte solutions, creating a circular link between past and present, research, development, and uptake.…”
Section: The Independent Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the shortterm the Independent Frame's methods were not widely adopted by the industry, it was nevertheless influential in the longer-term development of Pinewood's reputation for technological innovation and state-of-the-art facilities. 87 In the shorterterm, it responded to contemporary debates about rising film production costs which appeared to hamper the industry's planned expansion. At the end of 1948 a committee chaired by Lord Gater examined rising costs and recommended that studios needed to economise, institute time management, and make more efficient use of space.…”
Section: Labour Materials and Production Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whitehead claimed to have been responsible for 'the first bigscreen back projection shot', with the Western Electric interlocking camera and projector for the Paramount British film Lily Christine (1932), shot at British and Dominion studios, Elstree (Whitehead 1947: 13). 5 Staffell worked at Pinewood on the 'Independent Frame' films of the late 1940s that used back projection as a core method in its aim of producing British films more efficiently (Street 2020). In 1947 David Rawnsley, the British set designer who devised the Independent Frame system, and Edward Green of Production Facilities (Films) based at Denham, collaborated on the invention of an improved mobile and adjustable screen holder for use in back projection, together with 'a platform or gantry elevated above the back-projection screen .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%