1975
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj1954.22.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pinealectomy and Sexual Rhythm in Female Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

1975
1975
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous results on the effect of pinealectomy on the oestrous cycle in rats are conflicting. In the experiment reported here, there was no change in the duration of the oestral phase of the cycle, while others indicate an increase in the oes trous phase [Chit et al, 1964], Takeo et al [1975], fail to report any effect of pinealec tomy on the oestrous cycle at all. Differences in photoperiods, in rat strains employed as well as in timing of pineal ablation, may account for the variations in the results ob tained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Previous results on the effect of pinealectomy on the oestrous cycle in rats are conflicting. In the experiment reported here, there was no change in the duration of the oestral phase of the cycle, while others indicate an increase in the oes trous phase [Chit et al, 1964], Takeo et al [1975], fail to report any effect of pinealec tomy on the oestrous cycle at all. Differences in photoperiods, in rat strains employed as well as in timing of pineal ablation, may account for the variations in the results ob tained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This coincides with the previous results obtained by Takahashi and Suzuki (1969) and by members of our laboratory (Takeo et al, 1974). LL-0 rats resumed cyclicity in higher incidence than LL-70 ones by the injection of reserpine for 2 days and the restored cyclicity eventually disappeared by subsequent continuous illumination.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, Takahashi and Suzuki (1969) and Takeo et al(1974) reported that the rats exposed to LL from the day of birth were not so susceptible to constant illumination in manifestation of persistent estrus as the rats subjected to LL from advanced ages. In the present experiment, ovarian morphology was compared between the rats exposed to LL from 70 days of age and from the day of birth.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the method of Maekawa (1956) was used for the expression of vaginal smear records; the thin baseline of the figures corresponds to non-estrous stages which contain proestrus, metestrus and diestrus, and the thick top to perfect estrus. As authors' previous paper (Takeo et al, 1974) Fig. 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, the rats brought up from birth under continuous illumination maintain the estrous cycles for long time in their postpuberal life (Maekawa, 1959;Takahashi and Suzuki, 1969;Hoffmann, 1973;Takeo et al, 1974). On the contrary, immature rats at about 30days of age exhibit the persistent estrus soon after exposure to continuous illumination (Takahashi and Suzuki, 1969;Takeo et al, 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%