Abstract:Pinatubo volcanic aerosol layer is studied with a neodymium:yttrium/aluminium/garnet (Nd:YAG) (532 nm) backscatter lidar system at the Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad (23°N, 72.5°E), India, from April 1992 to May 1994. The results obtained on the integrated mass densities and aerosol backscatter from 17 to 30 km show a 1/e‐folding time of 9 months, for the Pinatubo aerosol layer to decay. Calculations show that if the layer decays at the same rate, then it may take about 4.5 years for the stratosphere … Show more
“…Parameswaran et al (1991) reported an agreement that was satisfactory between lidar and SAGE II with large variability in tropospheric extinction. Aerosol extinctions between lidar and SAGE II compared well in the 17-30 km altitude region after the Mt Pinatubo eruption (Jayaraman et al, 1995). The lidar profiles were found to match fairly well with the SAGE II profiles (version 6.20) when the spatial separation between the instruments was in the order of a few hundreds of kilometres .…”
Section: P Kulkarni and S Ramachandran: Comparison Of Aerosol Extinsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…(1) at Trivandrum (Parameswaran et al, 1991) during volcanically quiescent conditions, (2) at Ahmedabad after the Mt Pinatubo volcanic eruption (Jayaraman et al, 1995) and (3) at Gadanki . It is to be noted that, in general, the comparisons between lidar and SAGE II focussed on instrument capabilities and were restricted to a limited number of days in the case of (1) and (2).…”
Section: P Kulkarni and S Ramachandran: Comparison Of Aerosol Extinmentioning
Abstract. An extensive comparison of aerosol extinction has been performed using lidar and Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II data over Gadanki (13.5 • N, 79.2 • E), a tropical station in India, following coincident criteria during volcanically quiescent conditions from 1998 to 2005. The aerosol extinctions derived from lidar are higher than SAGE II during all seasons in the upper troposphere (UT), while in the lower-stratosphere (LS) values are closer. The seasonal mean percent differences between lidar and SAGE II aerosol extinctions are > 100 % in the UT and < 50 % above 25 km. Different techniques (point and limb observations) played the major role in producing the observed differences. SAGE II aerosol extinction in the UT increases as the longitudinal coverage is increased as the spatial aerosol extent increases, while similar extinction values in LS confirm the zonal homogeneity of LS aerosols. The study strongly emphasized that the best meteorological parameters close to the lidar measurement site in terms of space and time and B a (sr −1 ), the ratio between aerosol backscattering and extinction, are needed for the tropics for a more accurate derivation of aerosol extinction.
“…Parameswaran et al (1991) reported an agreement that was satisfactory between lidar and SAGE II with large variability in tropospheric extinction. Aerosol extinctions between lidar and SAGE II compared well in the 17-30 km altitude region after the Mt Pinatubo eruption (Jayaraman et al, 1995). The lidar profiles were found to match fairly well with the SAGE II profiles (version 6.20) when the spatial separation between the instruments was in the order of a few hundreds of kilometres .…”
Section: P Kulkarni and S Ramachandran: Comparison Of Aerosol Extinsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…(1) at Trivandrum (Parameswaran et al, 1991) during volcanically quiescent conditions, (2) at Ahmedabad after the Mt Pinatubo volcanic eruption (Jayaraman et al, 1995) and (3) at Gadanki . It is to be noted that, in general, the comparisons between lidar and SAGE II focussed on instrument capabilities and were restricted to a limited number of days in the case of (1) and (2).…”
Section: P Kulkarni and S Ramachandran: Comparison Of Aerosol Extinmentioning
Abstract. An extensive comparison of aerosol extinction has been performed using lidar and Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II data over Gadanki (13.5 • N, 79.2 • E), a tropical station in India, following coincident criteria during volcanically quiescent conditions from 1998 to 2005. The aerosol extinctions derived from lidar are higher than SAGE II during all seasons in the upper troposphere (UT), while in the lower-stratosphere (LS) values are closer. The seasonal mean percent differences between lidar and SAGE II aerosol extinctions are > 100 % in the UT and < 50 % above 25 km. Different techniques (point and limb observations) played the major role in producing the observed differences. SAGE II aerosol extinction in the UT increases as the longitudinal coverage is increased as the spatial aerosol extent increases, while similar extinction values in LS confirm the zonal homogeneity of LS aerosols. The study strongly emphasized that the best meteorological parameters close to the lidar measurement site in terms of space and time and B a (sr −1 ), the ratio between aerosol backscattering and extinction, are needed for the tropics for a more accurate derivation of aerosol extinction.
“…One of them was done under stratospheric aerosol background conditions using data from Trivandrum, India (8.6°N, 77°E) for the first months of 1987 [ Parameswaran et al , 1991]. The other comparison was conducted right after the Mount Pinatubo eruption at Ahmedabad (23°N, 72.5°E) in April 1992 [ Jayaraman et al , 1995].…”
Section: Previous Stratosphere Aerosol and Gas Experiments (Sage) Ii‐lmentioning
[1] As a critical quality control step toward producing a stratospheric data assimilation system for volcanic aerosols, we conducted a comparison between Stratosphere Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II aerosol extinction profiles and aerosol backscatter measured by five lidars, both in the tropics and midlatitudes, for the two-year period following the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption. The period we studied is the most challenging for the SAGE II retrieval because the aerosol cloud caused so much extinction of the solar signal that in the tropics few retrievals were possible in the core of the cloud. We compared extinction at two wavelengths at the same time that we tested two sets of conversions coefficients. We used both Thomason and Jäger's extinction-to-backscatter conversion coefficients for converting lidar backscatter profiles at 0.532 mm or 0.694 mm wavelengths to the SAGE II extinction wavelengths of 0.525 mm and 1.020 mm or the nearby ones of 0.532 mm and 1.064 mm respectively. The lidars were located at Mauna Loa, Hawaii (19.5°N, 155.6°W), Camagüey, Cuba (21.4°N, 77.9°W), Hefei, China (31.9°N, 117.2°W), Hampton Virginia (37.1°N, 76.3°W), and Haute Provence, France (43.9°N, 5.7°W). For the six months following the eruption the aerosol cloud was much more heterogeneous than later. Using two alternative approaches, we evaluated the aerosol extinction variability of the tropical core of the Pinatubo stratospheric aerosol cloud at the timescale of 1-2 days, and found it was quite large. Aerosol variability played the major role in producing the observed differences between SAGE II and the lidars. There was in general a good agreement between SAGE II extinction measurements and lidar derived extinction, and we conclude that all five lidar sets we compared can be used in a future data assimilation of stratospheric aerosols. This is the most comprehensive comparison yet of lidar data with satellite data for the Pinatubo period.
“…Pinatubo whenever SAGE II had an occultation pass around the respective lidar location. Most of the earlier inter-comparisons between the aerosol extinction profiles obtained from SAGE-II and lidar (Lu et al, 1997;Russell and McCormick, 1989;Rizi et al, 2000;Yue et al, 1995;Jayaraman et al, 1995) were carried out over the mid and high latitudes when the lower stratosphere was volcanically disturbed. Only very few such comparisons exist over the tropics under volcanically quiescent conditions.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.