2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1098-3015(10)64786-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pin10 Cost Effectiveness Oftipranavir in Treatment-Experienced Hiv Patients in the Usa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct comparisons between the results of this analysis and those of economic studies of other PI options for treatment-experienced patients are difficult. Simpson and colleagues [58] have published a US cost-effectiveness estimate of US$56 315 per QALY gained for TPV/r when compared with currently available PIs (excluding DRV/r). [58] This estimate was based on the results of the RESIST 1 and 2 trials, however, which enrolled a patient population with more advanced disease characteristics and treatment experience, more comparable to the highly treatment-experienced patients enrolled in the POWER trials than to the patients modelled in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct comparisons between the results of this analysis and those of economic studies of other PI options for treatment-experienced patients are difficult. Simpson and colleagues [58] have published a US cost-effectiveness estimate of US$56 315 per QALY gained for TPV/r when compared with currently available PIs (excluding DRV/r). [58] This estimate was based on the results of the RESIST 1 and 2 trials, however, which enrolled a patient population with more advanced disease characteristics and treatment experience, more comparable to the highly treatment-experienced patients enrolled in the POWER trials than to the patients modelled in our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simpson and colleagues [58] have published a US cost-effectiveness estimate of US$56 315 per QALY gained for TPV/r when compared with currently available PIs (excluding DRV/r). [58] This estimate was based on the results of the RESIST 1 and 2 trials, however, which enrolled a patient population with more advanced disease characteristics and treatment experience, more comparable to the highly treatment-experienced patients enrolled in the POWER trials than to the patients modelled in our analysis. [32,45,59] Simpson et al [60] also recently published a costeffectiveness study of HAART regimens including LPV/r compared with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in treatment-experienced patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%