2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Piloted ignition delay of PMMA in space exploration atmospheres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, most low‐pressure fire studies compare the combustion characteristics of the same fuel at different altitudes . The experiments were primarily done in Lhasa (altitude, 3650 m; pressure, P = 64.3 kPa) and Hefei (altitude, 50 m; P = 101 kPa), and a small number of fire tests were performed at three to four altitudes and in a low‐pressure chamber . The fire test fuel was classified into gaseous, liquid, and solid fuel, and similar conclusions have been reached: In higher‐altitude areas, the flame height, flame volume, ignition temperature, and ignition time increase, but the burning rate and flame pulsation decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At present, most low‐pressure fire studies compare the combustion characteristics of the same fuel at different altitudes . The experiments were primarily done in Lhasa (altitude, 3650 m; pressure, P = 64.3 kPa) and Hefei (altitude, 50 m; P = 101 kPa), and a small number of fire tests were performed at three to four altitudes and in a low‐pressure chamber . The fire test fuel was classified into gaseous, liquid, and solid fuel, and similar conclusions have been reached: In higher‐altitude areas, the flame height, flame volume, ignition temperature, and ignition time increase, but the burning rate and flame pulsation decrease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1,2 The experiments were primarily done in Lhasa (altitude, 3650 m; pressure, P = 64.3 kPa) and Hefei (altitude, 50 m; P = 101 kPa), and a small number of fire tests were performed at three to four altitudes 3,4 and in a low-pressure chamber. [5][6][7][8][9] The fire test fuel was classified into gaseous, 10,11 liquid, 2,[12][13][14] and solid fuel, [15][16][17][18] and similar conclusions have been reached: In higher-altitude areas, the flame height, flame volume, ignition temperature, and ignition time increase, but the burning rate and flame pulsation decrease. The mass burning rate, radiative heat flux, heat release rate, and combustion efficiency in Lhasa were lower than those in Hefei, and the relationship between the burning rate and the ambient pressure could be simulated with the power function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In series 2, since the Reynolds number is constant, the convective heat transfer coefficient can be regarded as constant (McAllister, et al, 2009), (Gabour and Lienhard, 1994). The factors which may cause a change in the fuel gasification rate are either the temperature in the vicinity of the fuel surface, or a change in the gasification enthalpy of the solid fuel (Han, et al, 2005), (Kissinger, 1954) .…”
Section: Additional Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would also have an effect on activation energy E and B number, which could explain the deviation of blowoff limit between series 1 and series 2 (Kayacan and Dogan, 2008). In McAllister's studies (McAllister, et al, 2009), the ignition time of a PMMA fuel sample was shortened when the pressure was decreased.…”
Section: Additional Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%