2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot trial using mass field-releases of sterile males produced with the incompatible and sterile insect techniques as part of integrated Aedes aegypti control in Mexico

Abstract: Background The combination of Wolbachia-based incompatible insect technique (IIT) and radiation-based sterile insect technique (SIT) can be used for population suppression of Aedes aegypti. Our main objective was to evaluate whether open-field mass-releases of wAlbB-infected Ae. aegypti males, as part of an Integrated Vector Management (IVM) plan led by the Mexican Ministry of Health, could suppress natural populations of Ae. aegypti in urbanized settings in south Mexico. Methodology/Principal findings We im… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The suppression approach (S2) using the first strain at FRERs of 10 −3 and 10 −9 resulted in an 82.4% (95% UI: 80.0-85.0%) and 82.5% (95% UI: 79.7-85.4%) decline in the wild-type female population, respectively (Figure 2C,D), relative to the baseline (S1) equilibrium wild-type population. These results confirm the levels of suppression achieved on the wild type female mosquito population from ecological experiments [43,44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The suppression approach (S2) using the first strain at FRERs of 10 −3 and 10 −9 resulted in an 82.4% (95% UI: 80.0-85.0%) and 82.5% (95% UI: 79.7-85.4%) decline in the wild-type female population, respectively (Figure 2C,D), relative to the baseline (S1) equilibrium wild-type population. These results confirm the levels of suppression achieved on the wild type female mosquito population from ecological experiments [43,44].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Red-eye genetic sexing strains have also been developed for Aedes aegypti , but these similarly rely on expensive automated sex-sorting for efficient production ( Koskinioti et al, 2021 ). For some, imperfect manual sex-sorting leads to the need for additional irradiation sterilisation steps ( Zheng et al, 2019 ; Martín-Park et al, 2022 ), or RNAi-based sterilization ( De Castro Poncio et al, 2021 ) which also add cost and complexity. A further operational restriction is the short shelf-life of adult male mosquitoes (sometimes requiring release within as little as 24 h after production ( Crawford et al, 2020 )) that has limited the locations in which these tools can be used, as they either require local production facilities, or fast and efficient shipping of live mosquitoes in climate-controlled conditions to release sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strategies employ male Aedes aegypti that when mated with wild females render some or all the offspring unviable. The sterile insect technique (SIT), involving irradiation of mosquitoes to induce sterility and physical sex-sorting to enable male-only releases, has historically not been successful for Aedes aegypti ( Morlan et al, 1962 ; Ogah and Juma, 1977 ), though some recent successes in small-scale trials in Mexico (involving a combination of SIT and Wolbachia -infected males) and Cuba indicate a renewed interest in SIT for Aedes aegypti ( Gato et al, 2021 ; Martín-Park et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…aegypti control) and Mexico (IIT–SIT for Ae. aegypti control) in a mosquito control project [ 27 , 50 , 52 ].…”
Section: Release Of Sterilized Male Mosquitoesmentioning
confidence: 99%