2011
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0b013e31822c61c3
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot trial of IOM duty hour recommendations in neurology residency programs

Abstract: The results from 3 residency programs suggest that the IOM WDH recommendations may negatively affect neurology resident education. This study was limited by the short duration of implementation, negative bias against the IOM recommendations, and inability to blind faculty. Additional study of the IOM WDH recommendations is warranted before widespread implementation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 27 studies included in the final review: 13 (48%) reviewed shift length, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] 12 (44%) examined Across all of the studies and interventions, the impact of duty hour restrictions most frequently had no impact on patient care (5 of 10, 50%), 23,24,28,41,48 no impact on resident well-being (7 of 17, 41%), 27,34,35,41,44,46,49 and an unfavorable impact on resident education (9 of 14, 64%). 29,30,[33][34][35][36]41,43,46 A minority of studies found a favorable impact on resident well-being (4 of 17, 24%; TABLE 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 27 studies included in the final review: 13 (48%) reviewed shift length, [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] 12 (44%) examined Across all of the studies and interventions, the impact of duty hour restrictions most frequently had no impact on patient care (5 of 10, 50%), 23,24,28,41,48 no impact on resident well-being (7 of 17, 41%), 27,34,35,41,44,46,49 and an unfavorable impact on resident education (9 of 14, 64%). 29,30,[33][34][35][36]41,43,46 A minority of studies found a favorable impact on resident well-being (4 of 17, 24%; TABLE 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30,[33][34][35][36]41,43,46 A minority of studies found a favorable impact on resident well-being (4 of 17, 24%; TABLE 2). 32,33,45,48 When analyzed by intervention type, the most frequent result of shift length changes was no impact (8 of 20, 40%), 23,24,27,28,31,32,34,35 that of night float was an unfavorable impact (10 of 18, 56%), [35][36][37][38][39][41][42][43]46,47 and for protected time for sleep, 1 study reported a favorable outcome for resident wellness (1 of 2, 50%) 48 but no impact on patient care, while the other study was unfavorable for resident well-being (1 of 2, 50%). 49 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used a control month using the 2003 ACGME duty hour requirements, and an intervention month using more restrictive requirements limiting the number of continuous hours worked. 7 During the intervention month, residents reported lower scores in quality of life, patient care, and satisfaction with education, while faculty reported lower scores on resident knowledge and quality of care. There was no improvement in resident sleepiness or increase of sleep time during the intervention month, despite the shorter shift length.…”
Section: Duty Hour Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…17 Resident and faculty satisfaction with continuity of care learning experiences has declined since initiation of duty hour limits. 18 Clinical rotations may require adjustments to enhance continuity of care…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%