Pilot study of unidirectional E-glass fibre-reinforced composite resin splints: Up to 4.5-year clinical follow-up

Kümbüloğlu, Övül; Saraçoğlu, Ahmet; Özcan, Mutlu

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.012

Cited by 37 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, a recent 6-year clinical follow-up study showed no significant differences between FRC and multistranded wire retainers; the results indicated that FRC retainers could be a viable alternative to multistranded wire retainers 15. Two recent clinical studies showed a 37.9% failure rate in a 6-month period with multistranded wire retainers11 and a 94.8% survival rate in a 4.5-year period with FRC retainers 16. From the adhesion perspective, the debonding force of FRC retainers was not found to be dependent on the type of bonding agent used 17.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The in vivo failure and survival rates of lingual retainers, in vitro testing of different retainer material complexes, and interpretation of the results are highly controversial 5,8-16. In a recent clinical report of metal and FRC retainers, the conventional multistranded wire retainers were suggested to remain the gold standard for orthodontic retention and the use of FRC retainers was discouraged because of their high failure rate (12% vs 51%, respectively) 14.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainersin vitro

2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo analyze the fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainers in vitro.MethodsRoots of human mandibular central incisors were covered with silicone, mimicking the periodontal ligament, and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. The specimens (N = 50), with two teeth each, were randomly divided into five groups (n = 10/group) according to the retainer materials: (1) Interlig (E-glass), (2) everStick Ortho (E-glass), (3) DentaPreg Splint (S2-glass), (4) Ribbond (polyethylene), and (5) Quad Cat wire (stainless steel). After the recommended adhesive procedures, the retainers were bonded to the teeth by using flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow). The teeth were subjected to 10,00,000 cyclic loads (8 Hz, 3 - 100 N, 45° angle, under 37 ± 3℃ water) at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance.ResultsAll the specimens survived the cyclic loading. Their mean debonding forces were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The DentaPreg Splint group (80%) showed the highest incidence of complete adhesive debonding, followed by the Interlig group (60%). The everStick Ortho group (80%) presented predominantly partial adhesive debonding. The Quad Cat wire group (50%) presented overlying composite detachment.ConclusionsCyclic loading did not cause debonding. The retainers presented similar debonding forces but different failure types. Braided stainless steel wire retainers presented the most repairable failure type.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainersin vitro

2013

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(2,5,6) The survival rates and failure rates as well of lingual retainers have a great controversy clinically, testing different retainer materials in vitro clarifies such results. (4,7) There is a great variability in the sites of failure of bonded retainers, which was reported as following: at the composite-enamel interface, at the composite-wire interface (adhesive failure), combination of both (compound failure), and fracture of the wire as a result of stresses. (5) The most common failures that reported in literature occurred in the first 6 months after bonding, while the patient's age and experience of the operator have no effect on the rate of failure.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of failure of three different aged orthodontic bonded retainers related to vertical load: in vitro study

ElSorogy

Hanafy

Yousry

et al. 2019

Egyptian Orthodontic Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction:Failure of orthodontic bonded retainers may affect the orthodontic results and cause relapse. Objectives:To compare in vitro the effect of vertical load on failure of three different bonded lingual retainers:Flat braided wire "Bond A. Braid", Dead soft wire "RESPOND", Fiber reinforced composite "Infibra Ribbon". Bonded with Tetric-N Flowadhesive system. Materials and Methods:Ninetymandibular incisorswere used in the study, thirty specimens (N=30) in triads divided into 3 groups (n=10 for each group). Roots of the incisors were covered with elastomeric impression material to mimic periodontal ligaments elasticity and embedded in triads in acrylic resin blocks. They were randomly divided into 3 groups to receive the following retainer retainers between the three groups. There was no significant difference between the ARI of the lingual retainer systems and types of failure as well.

show abstract

“…[9][10][11] Bazı çalışmalarda da diş mobilitesi artışının periodontal doku harabiyetini anlamlı derecede arttırdığı belirtilmiştir. [12][13][14]…”

Section: Diş Mobilitesi Ve Iyileşmeunclassified

Güncel Peri̇odontal Spli̇ntlere Genel Bakiş

Öncü¹

2019

Selcuk Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖZ Güncel periodontal splintlere genel bakışPeriodontal hastalıkların tedavisi sırasında tedavi edilecek alanda bulunan ve çeşitli nedenler ile destek dokularında oluşan kayıplara bağlı olarak mobilitesi artmış daimi dişlerin, periodontal tedavinin başarılı olabilmesi ve tedavi sonrası sağlık durumunun idamesi için iyileşmeyi destekleyecek şekilde splintlenmesi gerekmektedir. Literatürde birçok periodontal splint materyalinden bahsedilmektedir. Bu makalede periodontal harabiyet sonucunda mobilitesi artmış dişlerde kullanılan splint çeşitleri ve kullanım prensipleri güncel literatür ışığında gözden geçirilmiştir. ANAHTAR KELİMELER Fiberle güçlendirilmiş kompozit, mobilite, eriodontal splint ABSTRACT Current periodontal splintsDepending on the disability of the supportive tissues for various reasons, the increased mobility of the permanent teeth should be splinted to support periodontal healing and successful periodontal treatment. Many types of periodontal splints are mentioned in the literature. In this article, the types of splint which used in increased teeth mobility caused by periodontal damage and their usage principles are reviewed in the light of current literature.

show abstract

Pilot study of unidirectional E-glass fibre-reinforced composite resin splints: Up to 4.5-year clinical follow-up

Cited by 37 publications

References 13 publications

Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainersin vitro

Fatigue resistance, debonding force, and failure type of fiber-reinforced composite, polyethylene ribbon-reinforced, and braided stainless steel wire lingual retainersin vitro

Comparative evaluation of failure of three different aged orthodontic bonded retainers related to vertical load: in vitro study

Güncel Peri̇odontal Spli̇ntlere Genel Bakiş

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About