2002
DOI: 10.1080/14622200210128045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study of enhanced tobacco-cessation services coverage for low-income smokers

Abstract: This study explored the feasibility of covering nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) and paying for pharmacist-delivered smoking cessation counseling at the time of NRT pick-up for low-income, managed Medicaid and Basic Health Plan (a state insurance program) enrollees. A prospective pilot intervention was used at two community health centers (CHCs) and two community pharmacies. Participants were adult managed-Medicaid or Basic Health Plan enrollees who attended the pilot CHCs and smoked. An innovative insurance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…System approaches to improving smoking cessation services in clinical settings have included (a) training of physicians (Cornuz et al, 1997;Richmond, Mendelsohn, & Kehoe, 1998;Swartz, Cowan, DePue, & Goldstein, 2002), (b) including smoking status as a vital sign (Fiore et al, 1995;Robinson, Laurent, & Little, 1995), (c) staff training and educational materials (Lancaster, Silagy, & Fowler, 2004;Pine, Sullivan, Sauser, & David, 1997;Solberg, Maxwell, Kottke, Gepner, & Brekke, 1990), (d) assignment of smoking cessation interventions to job descriptions of professionals other than physicians or to teams (Hollis et al, 2000;Hollis, Lichtenstein, Vogt, Stevens, & Biglan, 1993), (e) chart reminders used alone (Chang, Zimmerman, & Beck, 1995) or with other strategies such as free nicotine replacement (Cohen et al, 1987), and (f) reduced or reimbursed costs for smoking cessation services Curry, Grothaus, McAfee, & Pabiniak, 1998;Doescher et al, 2002;. A multicomponent approach that included prioritization of prevention objectives, quality management techniques, and attention to influences on service delivery at the practice, organizational, and community levels was effective (Thompson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…System approaches to improving smoking cessation services in clinical settings have included (a) training of physicians (Cornuz et al, 1997;Richmond, Mendelsohn, & Kehoe, 1998;Swartz, Cowan, DePue, & Goldstein, 2002), (b) including smoking status as a vital sign (Fiore et al, 1995;Robinson, Laurent, & Little, 1995), (c) staff training and educational materials (Lancaster, Silagy, & Fowler, 2004;Pine, Sullivan, Sauser, & David, 1997;Solberg, Maxwell, Kottke, Gepner, & Brekke, 1990), (d) assignment of smoking cessation interventions to job descriptions of professionals other than physicians or to teams (Hollis et al, 2000;Hollis, Lichtenstein, Vogt, Stevens, & Biglan, 1993), (e) chart reminders used alone (Chang, Zimmerman, & Beck, 1995) or with other strategies such as free nicotine replacement (Cohen et al, 1987), and (f) reduced or reimbursed costs for smoking cessation services Curry, Grothaus, McAfee, & Pabiniak, 1998;Doescher et al, 2002;. A multicomponent approach that included prioritization of prevention objectives, quality management techniques, and attention to influences on service delivery at the practice, organizational, and community levels was effective (Thompson et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For heavy smokers (≥ 20 cigarettes/day), it was 11% for the treatment group and 4% for the placebo group (p<0.05). At 6 months in 35 To assess effectiveness of a smoking-15 pharmacists from 7 chain 48 smokers, self-referred or cessation program in chain pharmacies 36 pharmacies in Richmond, Virginia referred by primary care provider…”
Section: Controlled and Nonverifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a second U.S. study, 32 self-referred patients participated in a pharmacist-delivered smokingcessation program at two community health centers and two community pharmacies. 35 This 36 1 C A S R 8 (4/50) 37 Same 12 TOI PP SR 41.5 (54/130) 38 36. 39 17.2 (34/198) 6 wks CA SR ITT = intent-to-treat; CA = continuous abstinence; CO = exhaled carbon monoxide test; PP = point prevalence; TOI = time-of-interview; SR = self-report.…”
Section: Uncontrolled and Nonverifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One controlled trial was identified and evaluated NRT and counselling in a pharmacy-based smoking-cessation programme in Glasgow (Dickson 2000). 24 Four cohort studies were identified: in Sydney Australia (Carroll 2000), 25 Washington DC (Doescher 2001), 26 Virginia USA (Kennedy 2002, 27 and Iowa USA (Zillich 2002). 28 A summary of the methods used to evaluate the studies is shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%