2010
DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0b013e3181dac920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Study of Blood Biomarker Candidates for Detection of Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract: Objectives Biomarkers that detect pancreatic cancer at earlier stages could improve the outcome of this deadly disease. Methods We investigated a dozen biomarker candidates for their potential as pancreatic cancer blood biomarkers using ELISA assays. Results Among them, the MIF and OPN blood tests were nearly perfect in distinguishing pancreatic cancer cases from healthy controls (100% and 95% sensitivity respectively at 100% specificity). Five biomarker candidates were then tested on an expanded set of di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the performance of the CA19-9 ELISA in this study (AUC 0.57) was not as robust as some reports in the literature, TIMP1 and ICAM biomarkers still performed better than the recently reported CA19-9 AUC of 0.716 66 . Lastly, these data show the importance of testing pancreatic cancer biomarkers on chronic pancreatitis controls as we reported previously 14;67 : many biomarker candidates lost some accuracy when distinguishing chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer – a phenomenon that is frequently seen in pancreatic cancer biomarker candidates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…While the performance of the CA19-9 ELISA in this study (AUC 0.57) was not as robust as some reports in the literature, TIMP1 and ICAM biomarkers still performed better than the recently reported CA19-9 AUC of 0.716 66 . Lastly, these data show the importance of testing pancreatic cancer biomarkers on chronic pancreatitis controls as we reported previously 14;67 : many biomarker candidates lost some accuracy when distinguishing chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer – a phenomenon that is frequently seen in pancreatic cancer biomarker candidates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We tested combinations of 2, 3, or 4 biomarker candidates using “and” and “or” rules 27;37 . At 95% specificity, the combination of gelsolin and lumican using an “and” rule achieved 80% sensitivity, an improvement of 5% over the top performing single marker candidate, gelsolin (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies of methylation marker panels for pancreatic cancer detection will also need to include diseased controls, such as patients with chronic pancreatitis, early in the development process. 40 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%