2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10147-005-0520-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot study of angiotensin II receptor blocker in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Abstract: These data showed that an ARB had potential biological effects on prostate cancer, suggesting the usefulness of the cytostatic activity of such agents on recurrent prostate cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first report of the potential utility of ACE inhibitors in preventing cancer development was that of Lever et al (1998) who surveyed data from patients receiving these medications for other reasons, but their findings were not confirmed by others (Meier et al 2000, Li et al 2003, Gonzalez-Perez et al 2004, Ronquist et al 2004, Fryzek et al 2006, Rosenthal & Gavras 2009, nor, in similar patient studies was the use of angiotensin II antagonists in any way linked with the disease (Fryzek et al 2006, Teo 2011. One report suggests that candesartan, an AT1 receptor blocker, when used at a dose similar to that used in patients for other reasons, has beneficial effects in prostate cancer, in that circulating prostate-specific antigen is reduced (Uemura et al 2005a), though this study does not appear to have been repeated. Others have even suggested a modest increase in cancers of all types in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers (Sipahi et al 2010), though this too has been contested (Volpe et al 2011).…”
Section: Angiotensin In Cancer Epidemiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 60%
“…The first report of the potential utility of ACE inhibitors in preventing cancer development was that of Lever et al (1998) who surveyed data from patients receiving these medications for other reasons, but their findings were not confirmed by others (Meier et al 2000, Li et al 2003, Gonzalez-Perez et al 2004, Ronquist et al 2004, Fryzek et al 2006, Rosenthal & Gavras 2009, nor, in similar patient studies was the use of angiotensin II antagonists in any way linked with the disease (Fryzek et al 2006, Teo 2011. One report suggests that candesartan, an AT1 receptor blocker, when used at a dose similar to that used in patients for other reasons, has beneficial effects in prostate cancer, in that circulating prostate-specific antigen is reduced (Uemura et al 2005a), though this study does not appear to have been repeated. Others have even suggested a modest increase in cancers of all types in patients receiving angiotensin receptor blockers (Sipahi et al 2010), though this too has been contested (Volpe et al 2011).…”
Section: Angiotensin In Cancer Epidemiological Evidencementioning
confidence: 60%
“…Concerning other tumor types, Kosugi et al (23) demonstrated that candesartan prevented the pulmonary metastasis of RCC and BC by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis through the suppression of VEGF in a xenograft model. Uemura et al (27) reported that, upon administering candesartan clinically to PC patients with hypertension, the level of prostate-specific antigen declined and the performance status of the patients improved. However, they also reported that candesartan had no effects on tumor growth in vitro, and did not detect apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kosugi et al reported that Candesartan (an ARB) prevented the pulmonary metastasis of renal cancer and bladder tumors by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis through the suppression of VEGF in a xenograft model (28). In prostate cancer, some investigators reported that Candesartan inhibited the production of VEGF, one of the most potent and specific angiogenic factors, and decreased the prostate cancer (29,32). Kosaka et al reported that a specific ARB suppressed VEGF production, resulting in reduced tumor angiogenesis and a slower progression of prostate cancer in a tumor xenograft model (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kosaka et al reported that a specific ARB suppressed VEGF production, resulting in reduced tumor angiogenesis and a slower progression of prostate cancer in a tumor xenograft model (29). Uemura et al reported that the clinical use of Candesartan in prostate cancer patients with hypertension resulted in a reduction of prostate-specific antigen, while patient performance status improved (32). However, they also reported that Candesartan had no effect on tumor growth in vitro, and did not detect apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%