Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Healthy Eating, Physical Activity and Meaningful Social Connections Compared with Usual Care Control in People of Retirement Age Recruited from Workplaces

Abstract

BackgroundLifestyle interventions delivered during the retirement transition might promote healthier ageing. We report a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a web-based platform (Living, Eating, Activity and Planning through retirement; LEAP) promoting healthy eating (based on a Mediterranean diet (MD)), physical activity (PA) and meaningful social roles.MethodsA single blinded, two-arm RCT with individual allocation. Seventy-five adult regular internet users living in Northeast England, within two years of retirement, were recruited via employers and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive LEAP or a ‘usual care’ control. Intervention arm participants were provided with a pedometer to encourage self-monitoring of PA goals. Feasibility of the trial design and procedures was established by estimating recruitment and retention rates, and of LEAP from usage data. At baseline and 8-week follow-up, adherence to a MD derived from three 24-hour dietary recalls and seven-day PA by accelerometry were assessed. Healthy ageing outcomes (including measures of physiological function, physical capability, cognition, psychological and social wellbeing) were assessed and acceptability established by compliance with measurement protocols and completion rates. Thematically analysed, semi-structured, qualitative interviews assessed acceptability of the intervention, trial design, procedures and outcome measures.ResultsSeventy participants completed the trial; 48 (96%) participants in the intervention and 22 (88%) in the control arm. Participants had considerable scope for improvement in diet as assessed by MD score. LEAP was visited a median of 11 times (range 1–80) for a mean total time of 2.5 hours (range 5.5 min– 8.3 hours). ‘Moving more‘, ‘eating well’ and ‘being social’ were the most visited modules. At interview, participants reported that diet and PA modules were important and acceptable within the context of healthy ageing. Participants found both trial procedures and outcome assessments acceptable.ConclusionsThe trial procedures and the LEAP intervention proved feasible and acceptable. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LEAP to promote healthy lifestyles warrant evaluation in a definitive RCT.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02136381

Continuous Real-World Gait Monitoring in Idiopathic REM Sleep Behavior Disorder

“…a high alpha means that the total walking time is made up of proportionally short ABs compared to long ABs). Macro gait variability (S2) was derived evaluating the 'within subject' variability of AB length, with a higher Macro gait variability (S2) indicating a more varied walking activity pattern, while a lower Macro gait variability (S2) would mean a less varied walking activity, so a reduced engagement in different activity and a tendency to repeat the same pattern of activity [34,37,38].…”

e-Health Interventions for Healthy Aging: A Systematic Review

“…Five studies were conducted in the USA (24,(42)(43)(44)53), one in Japan (51) and the remaining eight in Europe (41,(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Among European studies, three were conducted in the Netherlands (47,48,50), two in the UK (46,52), and one in three countries (Greece, Spain and Sweden) (41). Furthermore, three studies presented different parts of their results in distinct publications: (i) Wijsman et al (50,54,55); (ii) van het Reve et al (49,56,57); and (iii) Peels et al (47,(58)(59)(60)(61)(62).…”

Planning and optimising a digital intervention to reduce older adults' cognitive decline

“…Additionally, our findings extend understandings about the value of social support. Whilst they concur that, for many, social support is an important motivator of behaviours such as physical activity (47), they reveal that for many it is not considered necessary or desirable. This has important implications for offering social support within interventions, i.e.…”

“…Reinforcement/encouragement for achievements (50) Self-monitoring of physical activity behaviours, e.g. using a pedometer (47,55) Social support in the form of activity suggestions to be done with others/ local group recommendations (47,50); social element of cognitive training may also be beneficial (51) Promotion of autonomy (50) Strength and balance exercises can be built into daily routines and activities (56)…”