2008
DOI: 10.2166/aqua.2008.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot plan protocol for optimization of UV dose required to obtain an appropriate municipal wastewater disinfection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Application of UV radiation for the disinfection of wastewater is a scientific task which has recently been explored. The number of facilities using UV disinfection has augmented in the last years and it is expected to keep increasing in the next years [2,4,6]. Ozone, on the other hand, has been described as an efficient disinfection agent, able not only to control bacteria, but also to oxidize organic matter in municipal effluents [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of UV radiation for the disinfection of wastewater is a scientific task which has recently been explored. The number of facilities using UV disinfection has augmented in the last years and it is expected to keep increasing in the next years [2,4,6]. Ozone, on the other hand, has been described as an efficient disinfection agent, able not only to control bacteria, but also to oxidize organic matter in municipal effluents [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dose dependence has been observed with the inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, with a high dose of 913 mJ/cm 2 of UV irradiation causing damage to the cell membrane, while the membrane remained intact with a relatively low dose of 0-203 mJ/cm 2 [35]. Meanwhile, Salcedo Dávila et al [36] found with a pilot plant that a mean UV dose of 50 mWs/cm 2 was sufficient to meet required microbiological quality standards. Nguyen et al [5] observed that inactivation varied with the UV dose applied, finding that with 47.8 ± 1.6 mJ/cm 2 the coliphage MS2 reduction was 2.6 ± 0.1 uLog, while with a dose of 69.4 ± 3.8 mJ/cm 2 the reduction increased to 3.7 ± 0.2 uLog.…”
Section: Uv Dosementioning
confidence: 99%