2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot Evaluation of Aggregate Plate Waste as a Measure of Students’ School Lunch Consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a service level, the aggregated plate waste method is considered more suitable for food provision studies compared to the individual plate waste method [ 129 ], where total amount of food consumed is calculated by deducting the total amount of food wasted from the total amount of food served (as average portions) and dividing this by the number of children. A validation study by Chapman et al [ 130 ] found good agreement between individual and aggregated plate waste methods; however, both plate waste methods potentially underestimated vegetable consumption as some menu items, such as sandwich fillings, were not measured separately [ 129 ]. There is potential to combine aggregated plate waste with Sambell et al’s method [ 36 ] to get an accurate measure at service level of food served, consumed, and wasted, but this will require further research and validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a service level, the aggregated plate waste method is considered more suitable for food provision studies compared to the individual plate waste method [ 129 ], where total amount of food consumed is calculated by deducting the total amount of food wasted from the total amount of food served (as average portions) and dividing this by the number of children. A validation study by Chapman et al [ 130 ] found good agreement between individual and aggregated plate waste methods; however, both plate waste methods potentially underestimated vegetable consumption as some menu items, such as sandwich fillings, were not measured separately [ 129 ]. There is potential to combine aggregated plate waste with Sambell et al’s method [ 36 ] to get an accurate measure at service level of food served, consumed, and wasted, but this will require further research and validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dietary assessments in children pose unique challenges, including potentially limitations in children's concepts of time, food recognition and knowledge of preparation methods, ability to quantify estimated portion sizes, motivation, literacy, memory capabilities, and concentration spans (1, 19, 20). Objective measures of dietary assessments, such as plate-waste studies (21, 22), remote food photography (23), or the use of biospecimens (24, 25) (i.e., serum plasma carotenoids), may have lower potential for reporting biases, compared to subjective measures such as FFQs and 24hDR. However, objective methodologies have their limitations, often being burdensome, time-consuming, or unfeasible in large-scale or school-based data collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taylor et al found that digital imaging was highly reliable in assessing children's consumption of fruits and vegetables during the school lunch period and that this method could significantly reduce the time and labor costs required to measure food waste levels with essentially no change in the precision of the measurements [37]. Chapman et al found that categorizing wasted food and then measuring the weight of wasted food in each category provided a better estimate of the weight of food wasted on individual plates [38]. Malefors et al developed and used a new automated waste quantification tool to more accurately quantify the level of student food waste, with a 10% increase in accuracy over traditional measurements [39].…”
Section: Research Hotspotsmentioning
confidence: 99%