2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-58542-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pillar-Based Object Detection for Autonomous Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 13, our proposed PV-RCNN-v2 framework outperforms previous state-of-the-art method [24] significantly with +1.74% mAP LEVEL 1 gain and +1.79% mAP LEVEL 2 gain for the most important vehicle detection. Table 13 also demonstrates that our proposed PV-RCNN-v2 framework also consistently outperforms all previous methods in terms of pedestrian and cyclist detection, including very recent Pillar-based method [64] and Part-A2-Net [24]. Compared with our preliminary work PV-RCNN-v1, our latest PV-RCNN-v2 framework achieves remarkably better mAP/mAPH on all difficulty levels for the detection of all three categories, while also increasing the processing speed from 3.3 FPS to 10 FPS for the 3D detection of 150m × 150m such a large area, which validates the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed PV-RCNN-v2.…”
Section: D Detection On the Waymo Open Datasetmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 13, our proposed PV-RCNN-v2 framework outperforms previous state-of-the-art method [24] significantly with +1.74% mAP LEVEL 1 gain and +1.79% mAP LEVEL 2 gain for the most important vehicle detection. Table 13 also demonstrates that our proposed PV-RCNN-v2 framework also consistently outperforms all previous methods in terms of pedestrian and cyclist detection, including very recent Pillar-based method [64] and Part-A2-Net [24]. Compared with our preliminary work PV-RCNN-v1, our latest PV-RCNN-v2 framework achieves remarkably better mAP/mAPH on all difficulty levels for the detection of all three categories, while also increasing the processing speed from 3.3 FPS to 10 FPS for the 3D detection of 150m × 150m such a large area, which validates the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed PV-RCNN-v2.…”
Section: D Detection On the Waymo Open Datasetmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…[62], [63] utilize multiple detection heads while [24] explores the object part locations for improving the performance. In addition, [64], [65] predicts bounding box parameters following the anchor-free paradigm. These grid-based methods are generally efficient for accurate 3D proposal generation but the receptive fields are constraint by the kernel size of 2D/3D convolutions.…”
Section: D Object Detection With Point Cloudsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs have been applied to rendered images [34] or depth images [32] transformed from 3D data. Projection-based methods have also been proposed for object detection [15], [41], [53], scene segmentation [16], [47], registration [17], and 3D reconstruction [21], [28]. Furthermore, projection onto higherdimensional lattices was suggested for effective feature aggregation [33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It extracts the features from the pillar to assess the object of interest. This approach assesses the features rather than relaying on fixed encoders, and It tunes the model pillars instead of voxels [58]. In [59] a novel point pillar network has been designed based on quantization and pruning techniques for object detection, and they have used KITTI, Waymo, and NuScenes sets.…”
Section: Pillar-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%