2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pile-up corrections for high-precision superallowed decay half-life measurements via -ray photopeak counting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following dead-time corrections [17,18], the data were fit using a maximum-likelihood technique described in previous works [17][18][19][20]. The fitting routine included a component for the 14 O activity, the 26 Na activity, the 26 Al m activity, and a constant background.…”
Section: β Counting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following dead-time corrections [17,18], the data were fit using a maximum-likelihood technique described in previous works [17][18][19][20]. The fitting routine included a component for the 14 O activity, the 26 Na activity, the 26 Al m activity, and a constant background.…”
Section: β Counting Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of the γ -ray detection system used for half-life measurements is provided in Ref. [17]. The nonextendible dead time of the data-acquisition system, as well as the shaping times of the HPGe spectroscopy amplifiers, were varied throughout the experiment in order to investigate possible systematic effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following dead-time corrections [16,17], the ZDS data were fit using a maximum-likelihood technique described in previous works [16][17][18][19]. The fitting routine included a component for the 14 O activity, the 26 Na activity, the 26 Al m activity, and a constant background.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We correct this by assuming a Poisson distribution of the events around a measured average count rate. With this assumption, we can determine the pile-up probability once we have defined a "pile-up time window" [9]. This time window was determined in a similar fashion as the dead-time correction.…”
Section: Detector Electronics and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%