Pile Tests-Arkansas River Project

Mansur, C. I.; Hunter, Alfred H.

doi:10.1061/jsfeaq.0001455

Cited by 45 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many researchers have published results from physical modelling on the behaviour of laterally loaded piles. For example, Mansur et al (1964), Cox et al (1974) and Bhushan et al (1981) have investigated the behaviour of flexible piles in sand through physical modelling. The behaviour of non-slender piles has been investigated by, for instance, LeBlanc et al ( 2010a) and Peralta and Achmus (2010).…”

Section: Part II -Physical Modelling Of Laterally Loaded Non-slender ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

Sørensen¹

2013

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Part II -Physical Modelling Of Laterally Loaded Non-slender ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

Sørensen¹

2013

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to the related literature, the distance between the pile elements and the walls of test tank should be in excess of (10) times pile diameters as proposed by Phillips and Valsangkar [44] and Bolton et al [7]. Furthermore, Garnier et al [19] recommended that, the ratio between the width of test tank and the pile diameter should be in excess of (35). Therefore, the inner sizes of test tank were taken so as according to the recommended ratios.…”

Section: Test Tankmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considerable studies (theoretical, experimental and semi-experimental methods) were performed in the past to evaluate the pile load capacity and in sand. These methods can be categorized into three sections: 1st section, estimating the pile base capacity [11,37,41,51,55]; 2nd section, estimating the pile shaft capacity [11,18,27,30,35,36,37,38,44,53,55], nally, the effect of critical depth [41,46,54,59]. Most design methods idealize the pile-soil system to a certain extent; hence, the in uence of various additional factors affecting the pile load capacity in sand should be investigated [28].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geotechnical behavior of a single pile in sand with varied cross-section geometries and construction techniques

Sakr

Azzam

Kassim

2023

Innov. Infrastruct. Solut.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this experimental work, the in uence of pile cross-section with varied con gurations on the axial compression load capacity of a single pile and related settlement in sand are investigated. The in uence of relative sand density (D r ), the pile length to diameter (L/D) ratios and the pile installation techniques are presented. A testing program comprising seven model steel piles with varied shapes of 20 mm width/diameter was conducted. The tests are performed on model piles with the pile length to diameter ratios of 10 and 30 installed in the three cases of sand modeling as loose, medium dense and dense sand. Results indicated that, the rectangular pile is the optimization cross-sectional under the same pile geometry and soil conditions. Also, the increase of the relative sand density has a signi cant in uence on the ultimate compression pile load. Furthermore, the ultimate axial loads of exible piles in the case of loose sand using the nondisplacement method were found to be increased by 119%, 114%, 143%, 82% 139%, 89% and 100% comparing with the ultimate axial loads of rigid piles for the seven models of closed-ended pipe, open-ended pipe, conical base pipe, square closed-ended, square openended, tapered and rectangular piles respectively. While, these percentages were found to be increased by (49%, 37%, 26%, 78%, 35%, 71% and 91%) and (77%, 50%, 13%, 116%, 61%, 89% and 85%) in the cases of medium dense and dense sand respectively. The results also indicated that, piles installed in sand using jacking technique have more resistance compared with piles installed in sand using nondisplacement technique.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Model Study of a Single Pile With Varied Configuration in Sand

Sakr

Azzam

Kassim

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this experimental work, the influence of pile cross-section with varied configurations on the axial compression load capacity of a single pile and related settlement in sand are investigated. The influence of relative sand density (Dr), the pile length to diameter (L/D) ratios and the pile installation techniques are presented. A testing program comprising seven model steel piles with varied shapes of 20 mm width/diameter was conducted. The tests are performed on model piles with the pile length to diameter ratios of 10 and 30 installed in the three cases of sand modeling as loose, medium dense and dense sand. Results indicated that, the rectangular pile is the optimization cross-sectional under the same pile geometry and soil conditions. Also, the increase of the relative sand density has a significant influence on the ultimate compression pile load. Furthermore, the ultimate axial loads of flexible piles in the case of loose sand using the non-displacement method were found to be increased by 119%, 114%, 143%, 82% 139%, 89% and 100% comparing with the ultimate axial loads of rigid piles for the seven models of closed-ended pipe, open-ended pipe, conical base pipe, square closed-ended, square open-ended, tapered and rectangular piles respectively. While, these percentages were found to be increased by (49%, 37%, 26%, 78%, 35%, 71% and 91%) and (77%, 50%, 13%, 116%, 61%, 89% and 85%) in the cases of medium dense and dense sand respectively. The results also indicated that, piles installed in sand using jacking technique have more resistance compared with piles installed in sand using non-displacement technique.

show abstract

Pile Tests-Arkansas River Project

Cited by 45 publications

References 0 publications

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

Soil-Structure Interaction for Non-Slender, Large-Diameter Offshore Monopiles: Vol 1

Geotechnical behavior of a single pile in sand with varied cross-section geometries and construction techniques

Model Study of a Single Pile With Varied Configuration in Sand

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About