2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2009.03.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PILATUS: A single photon counting pixel detector for X-ray applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
200
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
200
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Correction for detector-sensitivity variation is an instrument-specific procedure, the details of which vary for different detector types. For pixel-array detectors (Henrich et al, 2009), one relevant factor is the probability of recording an individual scattered photon. In particular, the sensor has a fixed thickness of, for example, crystalline silicon (typically between 320 mm and 1 mm), giving rise to a specific probability of a photon being absorbed by the sensor, dependent on the wavelength of the photon and the incident angle,…”
Section: Research Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correction for detector-sensitivity variation is an instrument-specific procedure, the details of which vary for different detector types. For pixel-array detectors (Henrich et al, 2009), one relevant factor is the probability of recording an individual scattered photon. In particular, the sensor has a fixed thickness of, for example, crystalline silicon (typically between 320 mm and 1 mm), giving rise to a specific probability of a photon being absorbed by the sensor, dependent on the wavelength of the photon and the incident angle,…”
Section: Research Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent years there has been a step change in MX throughput, driven principally by the availability of new X-ray sources and data-collection methodologies (Emma et al, 2010;Ishikawa et al, 2012;White et al, 2012;Gati et al, 2014;Stellato et al, 2014;Sierra et al, 2016;Fuller et al, 2017), highframe-rate pixel-array detectors (Henrich et al, 2009), fast sample exchange (Russi et al, 2016) and automated data analysis (Winter, 2010;Winter & McAuley, 2011;Vonrhein et al, 2011). This allows larger numbers of smaller samples to be used, with correspondingly more challenging data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAXS patterns were recorded with a Pilatus 300k positionsensitive detector (Dectris Ltd, Switzerland) [44]. Later, SAXS was re-measured with a Pilatus 1M detector [45][46]. The beam used was point-collimated (1×0.7 mm) and monochromatized to 9.6 keV or 12 keV (repeated SAXS measurement) with a Si (311) double crystal monochromator.…”
Section: Small-and Wide-angle X-ray Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scattered X-rays were transported through an evacuated flight tube to the detector, which was placed 7.2 m behind the sample. The detector 23 was a Pilatus 2M, with 1675 Â 1475 square pixels of 172 mm size, and was protected from the direct beam by a central beamstop. The X-ray beam diameter at the detector position, measured with an attenuated beam and without inserted sample, corresponded to 3-4 detector pixels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%