Coccolithophores 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-06278-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pigment diversity of coccolithophores in relation to taxonomy, phylogeny and ecological preferences

Abstract: SummaryPigment analyses can be employed to study distribution, abundance and composition of natural phytoplankton populations using a chemotaxonomic approach. Cultured haptophytes have played a relevant role in advances in this analytical field and many pigments described in the literature were first detected in members of this algal group. The present chapter provides an historical overview of pigment detection in the Haptophyta and contains new data on their distribution in cultured coccolithophores (some of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barlow et al (2006) provided further details concerning all pigment data acquired during this cruise. In the present study, we focused on in situ concentrations of 19'-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (19'-HF), a mar ker pigment for openocean prymnesiophytes including the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Jeffrey & Vesk 1997, Barlow et al 2004, Van Lenning et al 2004, Cook et al 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barlow et al (2006) provided further details concerning all pigment data acquired during this cruise. In the present study, we focused on in situ concentrations of 19'-hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin (19'-HF), a mar ker pigment for openocean prymnesiophytes including the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Jeffrey & Vesk 1997, Barlow et al 2004, Van Lenning et al 2004, Cook et al 2011.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our approach, both light availability and mixed layer depth are accounted for in our E MLD calculation, which explains the relatively high Spearman's r S value (0.399) for this variable. A possible explanation as to why irradiance levels would have a different effect on different coccolithophore species is the fact that there is extra ordinary diversity in the pigment composition of different species, and even different strains of the same species (Van Lenning et al 2004). These variations include different pigment contents with an efficient light energy transfer function or with photoprotective function, and have an evolutionary origin that may result from adaptations to low or high irradiance.…”
Section: Environmental Variables Influencing Cocco Lithophore Communimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airs and Llewellyn (2006) explored improved liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry characterization of acyloxyfucoxanthins but limited their work to a single E. huxleyi strain (MBA92). A wider survey of coccolithophores with respect to pigment diversity including 21 E. huxleyi strains was conducted by van Lenning et al. (2004) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pigment profiles. While previous studies have characterized the pigment profile of E. huxleyi (van Lenning et al. 2004, Zapata et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%