2014
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pig Spermatozoa Defect in Acrosome Formation Caused Poor Motion Parameters and Fertilization Failure through Artificial Insemination and In vitro Fertilization

Abstract: The selection of morphologically normal spermatozoa is critical to obtain high breeding performances in boar breeding farms and artificial insemination (AI) centers. Parameters for the selection of semen mainly include total sperm motility, concentration, and morphology. However, these primary parameters are often not reliable for discriminating between normal and abnormal, non-fertilizable spermatozoa. The present study was designed to compare the motion characteristics, fertilization ability using in vitro f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…than those collected from low fertile males [9,14]. In many agricultural and clinical laboratories, routine practices of semen quality analyses for artificial insemination purpose are often limited to the evaluation of sperm concentration and proportion of motile spermatozoa due to the rapidity of the tests, but these parameters are still relatively poor predictors of semen fertility [5,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…than those collected from low fertile males [9,14]. In many agricultural and clinical laboratories, routine practices of semen quality analyses for artificial insemination purpose are often limited to the evaluation of sperm concentration and proportion of motile spermatozoa due to the rapidity of the tests, but these parameters are still relatively poor predictors of semen fertility [5,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many agricultural and clinical laboratories, routine practices of semen quality analyses for artificial insemination purpose are often limited to the evaluation of sperm concentration and proportion of motile spermatozoa due to the rapidity of the tests, but these parameters are still relatively poor predictors of semen fertility [5,9]. The aforementioned viability factors have tremendous impact on the fertility of spermatozoa during their progression within the female genital tract and their interactions with eggs at the site of fertilization [6,11,14], but their evaluation can be laborious and results are often available after the preparation of insemination doses. Although current available tests can be effective at quantifying the proportions of viable spermatozoa within semen ejaculates or doses for artificial insemination [8], the removal of damaged spermatozoa would be of great add-on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results can influence the seasonal reproductive differences in a farm, since VSL is correlated with the total number of live born piglets (Broekhuijse et al, 2012). Lee et al (2014) proposed that VSL should be considered to select semen for AI. Although LIN is not a sensitive indicator of sperm motion, Hirai et al (2001) found a higher non-return to estrus rate in boars with significantly higher LIN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, semen normally contains a heterogeneous population of spermatozoa with attributes that have a significant impact on male fertility potential [6,7]. For example, semen collected from normal fertile males usually results in significantly low proportions of abnormal spermatozoa and higher proportions of motile spermatozoa, with better viability (i.e., intact acrosome, plasma and mitochondrial membranes, low DNA fragmentation index) than those collected from low fertile males [8,9]. In many agricultural and clinical laboratories, routine practices of semen quality analyses for artificial insemination purpose are often limited to the evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphology due to the rapidity of the tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, these parameters are relatively poor predictors of semen fertility [1,10]. In contrast, the aforementioned viability factors are strong predictors of semen fertility due to their tremendous impacts on sperm progression within the female genital tract and interaction with the oocyte at the site of fertilization [9,11,12]; however, their evaluation can be laborious and results are often only available after the preparation of insemination doses. Although current available tests can be effective at quantifying the proportions of viable spermatozoa within semen ejaculates or doses for artificial insemination [13], the removal of damaged spermatozoa would be of great benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%