2020
DOI: 10.3390/biom10040554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pig Pregnancies after Transfer of Allogeneic Embryos Show a Dysregulated Endometrial/Placental Cytokine Balance: A Novel Clue for Embryo Death?

Abstract: Pig embryo transfer (ET) is burdened by high embryo mortality, with cytokines playing a significant role in recruitment of immune cells during embryo attachment and placentation. We hereby tested if their levels in endometrium and placenta from sows carrying hemi-allogeneic (artificially inseminated sows; C+ positive control) or allogeneic embryos (sows subjected to ET; ET) during peri-implantation (D18) or post-implantation (D24) are suitable mirrors of embryo rejection or tolerance after ET. Non-pregnant sow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that embryos (allogeneic in the case of ETs employing donor embryos and hemi-allogeneic in the case of AIs) have the potential to influence the uterine milieu at the time of implantation, and subsequently determine the fate of pregnancy. This dysregulation could be responsible for the differences in embryo survival at D24 found in a previous study conducted in our laboratory (8) where allogeneic ET sows presented higher percentages of embryo losses and delayed fetuses (54.5 and 22.2%, respectively) in comparison to hemiallogeneic AI sows (23.4 and 5.3%, respectively) at D24 of pregnancy. These results are not surprising, given the pivotal role of LIF during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This means that embryos (allogeneic in the case of ETs employing donor embryos and hemi-allogeneic in the case of AIs) have the potential to influence the uterine milieu at the time of implantation, and subsequently determine the fate of pregnancy. This dysregulation could be responsible for the differences in embryo survival at D24 found in a previous study conducted in our laboratory (8) where allogeneic ET sows presented higher percentages of embryo losses and delayed fetuses (54.5 and 22.2%, respectively) in comparison to hemiallogeneic AI sows (23.4 and 5.3%, respectively) at D24 of pregnancy. These results are not surprising, given the pivotal role of LIF during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…tissue samples consisted of pools of three different portions of the endometrium including the epithelial surface and endometrial glands (8). At D24, endometrium was collected from the site of implantation (IMP) and between implantation areas (Non-IMP).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, STAT3 is downregulated in the uterus and upregulated in the ampulla (q < 0.05), infundibulum, and in the UTJ (by seminal plasma only). The downregulation of STAT3 in the uterus (and UTJ by SP-AI) may be also related to its role in the immune response, which is mediated by IL-6 and IL-10 [76], and recently shown to be associated with an increase in embryonic mortality in pigs after embryo transfer [81]. In addition, STAT1 and STAT2 key mediators of the innate immune response providing a first-line defense against pathogens [82], are downregulated by natural mating in the cervix and the uterus and might decrease the inflammation produced by semen deposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, the percentage of non-pregnant animals after embryo transfer in our study was still higher than 64% in both groups. As it has been recently proposed, this could be associated to a dysregulation of pro and anti-in ammatory cytokine levels in recipient sows that, in turn, induce embryonic mortality [31]. However, many other factors related to either the quality of the embryos or the recipient's status and age could have been affecting these rates of unsuccessful transfers [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%