2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pig Longissimus lumborum proteome: Part II: Relationships between protein content and meat quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…environment, feeding) [15,16]. However, differences in the proteomic profiles also influence post mortem quality performances of pig meat.…”
Section: Proteomics and Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…environment, feeding) [15,16]. However, differences in the proteomic profiles also influence post mortem quality performances of pig meat.…”
Section: Proteomics and Bioinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in pig meat science, variations in glycolytic enzyme concentrations have been associated over the years to rearing environment, gender or breed specific differences, meat tenderness, fat accumulation and growth tendency [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results finally suggest that interindividual variability in intramuscular fat content might arise essentially from differences in early adipogenesis. Also in 2009, Kwasiborski et al [37,38], used 2DE to study proteome changes as a result of the original sire breed, rearing environment and gender. The authors determined that an actin isoform, a myosin light chain 2 isoform and cytochrome Bc1 had differential expression according to gender.…”
Section: Proteomics Of Muscle and Pork Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kwasiborski et al (2008) related 2-DE spots of the soluble portion from pig longissimus lumborum tissue to known meat quality traits using multiple regression analysis and determined that one to two proteins could explain between 25 and 85% of the variability in quality in this tissue. Relationships between the water holding capacity of pork and protein content were examined by van de Wiel and Zhang (2008) using a 2-DE approach.…”
Section: Meatmentioning
confidence: 99%