“…A slight mandibular rotation toward the excised side minimizes the excess growth; however, this movement strongly coincides with the occurrence of a contra-lateral open bite, which enables it by reducing the gap between the glenoid fossa and the neo-head from the bony stump [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The following open bite and the degree of malocclusion influence the type of surgical approach, including the decision to proceed in stages (step-by-step procedure) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ] or with an all-in-one approach (one surgical approach) and rarely a surgery-first approach [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. If the degree of an open bite is limited, and the condylar head is significantly enlarged in three dimensions, in some cases, a mandibular osteotomy should be combined with a condylectomy to improve the future neo-condyle position in the fossa and to decrease its instability and the probability of luxation [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”